HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Behavioral Effects of Neurofeedback Compared to Stimulants and Physical Activity in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

AbstractOBJECTIVE:
The efficacy of neurofeedback as a treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and whether neurofeedback is a viable alternative for stimulant medication, is still an intensely debated subject. The current randomized controlled trial compared neurofeedback to (1) optimally titrated methylphenidate and (2) a semi-active control intervention, physical activity, to account for nonspecific effects.
METHODS:
A multicenter 3-way parallel-group study with balanced randomization was conducted. Children with a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of ADHD, aged 7-13 years, were randomly allocated to receive neurofeedback (n = 39), methylphenidate (n = 36), or physical activity (n = 37) over a period of 10-12 weeks. Neurofeedback comprised theta/beta training on the vertex (Cz). Physical activity consisted of moderate to vigorous intensity exercises. Neurofeedback and physical activity were balanced in terms of number (~30) and duration of sessions. A double-blind pseudorandomized placebo-controlled crossover titration procedure was used to determine an optimal dose in the methylphenidate intervention. Parent and teacher ratings on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) and Strengths and Weaknesses of ADHD Symptoms and Normal Behavior (SWAN) were used to assess intervention outcomes. Data collection took place between September 2010 and March 2014.
RESULTS:
Intention-to-treat analyses revealed an improvement in parent-reported behavior on the SDQ and the SWAN Hyperactivity/Impulsivity scale, irrespective of received intervention (ηp² = 0.21-0.22, P ≤ .001), whereas the SWAN Inattention scale revealed more improvement in children who received methylphenidate than neurofeedback and physical activity (ηp² = 0.13, P ≤ .001). Teachers reported a decrease of ADHD symptoms on all measures for methylphenidate, but not for neurofeedback or physical activity (range of ηp² = 0.14-0.29, P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS:
The current study found that optimally titrated methylphenidate is superior to neurofeedback and physical activity in decreasing ADHD symptoms in children with ADHD.
TRIAL REGISTRATION:
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01363544.
AuthorsKatleen Geladé, Tieme W P Janssen, Marleen Bink, Rosa van Mourik, Athanasios Maras, Jaap Oosterlaan
JournalThe Journal of clinical psychiatry (J Clin Psychiatry) Vol. 77 Issue 10 Pg. e1270-e1277 (Oct 2016) ISSN: 1555-2101 [Electronic] United States
PMID27631143 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial)
Copyright© Copyright 2016 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
Chemical References
  • Central Nervous System Stimulants
  • Methylphenidate
Topics
  • Adolescent
  • Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity (diagnosis, physiopathology, psychology, therapy)
  • Beta Rhythm (physiology)
  • Central Nervous System Stimulants (therapeutic use)
  • Cerebral Cortex (physiopathology)
  • Child
  • Exercise (physiology, psychology)
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Methylphenidate (therapeutic use)
  • Neurofeedback (methods)
  • Theta Rhythm (physiology)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: