HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Is laparoscopic surgery really effective for the treatment of colon and rectal cancer in very elderly over 80 years old? A prospective multicentric case-control assessment.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
To evaluate the effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery (LCS) for colon and rectal cancer in the very elderly over 80 years old.
METHODS:
We performed a prospective multicentric analysis comparing patients over 80 years (Group A) and patients between 60 and 69 years (Group B) undergoing LCS for cancer from January 2008 to December 2013. Colon and rectal cancers were analyzed separately. Comorbidity and complications were classified using the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and the Clavien-Dindo system, respectively. Oncological parameters included tumor-free margins, number of lymph nodes harvested and circumferential resection margin.
RESULTS:
Group A included 96 and 33 patients, and Group B 220 and 82 for colon and rectal cancers, respectively. Groups were similar except for ASA score and CCI, as expected. There was no significant difference in operative time [colon; rectum] (180[IQR 150-200] vs 180[150-210] min; NS-180[160-210] vs 180[165-240] min; NS), estimated blood loss (50[25-75] vs 50[25-120] mL; NS-50[0-150] vs 50[25-108.7] mL; NS) and conversion rate (2.1 vs 2.7 %; NS-3.0 vs 2.4 %; NS). Timing of first stool (3[2-3.25] vs 3[2-5] dd; NS-3[2-4] vs 3[2-5] dd; NS), length of stay (7[6-8] vs 7[6-8] dd; NS-8[8-9] vs 8[7-9] dd; NS) and readmission rate (1.0 vs 0.45 %; NS-6.1 vs 1.2 %; NS) were similar. Tumor-free margins were appropriate, and positivity of CRM is poor (6.1 vs 4.9; NS). We did not record significant differences in complications rate (47.9 vs 43.6 %; NS-63.6 vs 52.4 %; NS).
CONCLUSIONS:
Laparoscopic surgery is effective for the treatment of colorectal cancer even in the very elderly. Age is not a risk factor or a limitation for LCS.
AuthorsFrancesco Roscio, Luigi Boni, Federico Clerici, Paolo Frattini, Elisa Cassinotti, Ildo Scandroglio
JournalSurgical endoscopy (Surg Endosc) Vol. 30 Issue 10 Pg. 4372-82 (10 2016) ISSN: 1432-2218 [Electronic] Germany
PMID26895891 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study)
Topics
  • Age Factors
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Blood Loss, Surgical
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Colonic Neoplasms (pathology, surgery)
  • Comorbidity
  • Conversion to Open Surgery
  • Digestive System Surgical Procedures (methods)
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy (methods)
  • Length of Stay
  • Lymph Node Excision (methods)
  • Lymph Nodes (pathology)
  • Male
  • Margins of Excision
  • Middle Aged
  • Operative Time
  • Patient Readmission
  • Prospective Studies
  • Rectal Neoplasms (pathology, surgery)
  • Rectum (surgery)
  • Risk Factors
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: