HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Efficacy and safety analysis of new P2Y12 inhibitors versus clopidogrel in patients with percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis.

AbstractOBJECTIVE:
New P2Y12 inhibitors, classified as oral (prasugrel and ticagrelor) and intravenous (cangrelor and elinogrel) drugs, have shown improved antithrombotic effects compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in landmark trials. The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of randomized trials that compared new P2Y12 inhibitors with clopidogrel to determine their efficacy and safety in patients undergoing PCI.
METHODS:
Randomized controlled trials of at least 4 weeks, comparing new P2Y12 inhibitors with clopidogrel in PCI, were identified using the electronic databases Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from January 1, 1980, to July 31, 2014.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:
The primary efficacy endpoints were all-cause death and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). The primary safety endpoint was thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major bleeding.
RESULTS:
Twelve studies including 71,097 patients met the inclusion criteria. New P2Y12 inhibitors significantly reduced all-cause death (odds ratio [OR]: 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-0.90, p < 0.0001), MACEs (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.73-0.90, p < 0.0001), stent thrombosis (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.49-0.69, p < 0.00001), myocardial infarctions (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.76-0.99, p = 0.03) and cardiovascular death (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.73-0.92, p = 0.001) compared with clopidogrel. There were no significant differences between stroke (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.72-1.05, p = 0.14) and major bleeding events (OR 1.22; 95% CI 0.99-1.52, p = 0.06) between the new P2Y12 inhibitor and clopidogrel groups.
CONCLUSION:
New P2Y12 inhibitors decreased death in patients undergoing PCI compared with clopidogrel with a considerable safety and tolerability profile; however, the risk/benefit ratio of ischemic and bleeding events should be further investigated.
AuthorsXue-Dong Gan, Bao-Zhu Wei, Dong Fang, Qi Fang, Kai-Yong Li, Shi-Lan-Ying Ding, Song Peng, Jing Wan
JournalCurrent medical research and opinion (Curr Med Res Opin) Vol. 31 Issue 12 Pg. 2313-23 (Dec 2015) ISSN: 1473-4877 [Electronic] England
PMID26402735 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Review)
Chemical References
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
  • Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists
  • Clopidogrel
  • Ticlopidine
Topics
  • Acute Coronary Syndrome (therapy)
  • Clopidogrel
  • Hemorrhage (chemically induced)
  • Humans
  • Myocardial Infarction (therapy)
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (methods)
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Stroke (epidemiology, etiology)
  • Ticlopidine (adverse effects, analogs & derivatives, therapeutic use)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: