The recent American Academy of Neurology position paper by Franklin, "
Opioids for chronic noncancer
pain," suggests that the benefits of
opioid treatment are very likely to be substantially outweighed by the risks and recommends avoidance of doses above 80-120 mg/day
morphine equivalent. However, close reading of the primary literature supports a different conclusion:
opioids have been shown in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to be highly effective in the treatment of chronic nonmalignant
pain; long-term follow-up studies have shown that this effectiveness can be maintained; and effectiveness has been limited in many clinical trials by failure to take into account high variability in dose requirements, failure to adequately treat depression, and use of suboptimal outcome measures. Frequency of side effects in many RCTs has been inflated by overly rapid dose titration and failure to appreciate the high interindividual variability in side effect profiles. The recent marked increase in incidence of
opioid overdose is of grave concern, but there is good reason to believe that it has been somewhat exaggerated. Potential causes of overdose include inadequately treated depression; inadequately treated
pain, particularly when compounded by hopelessness; inadvertent overdose; concurrent use of alcohol; and insufficient practitioner expertise. Effective treatment of
pain can enable large numbers of patients to lead productive lives and improve quality of life. Effective alleviation of suffering associated with
pain falls squarely within the physician's professional obligation. Existing scientific studies provide the basis for many improvements in
pain management that can increase effectiveness and reduce risk. Many potentially useful areas of further research can be identified.