The Effects of Maxillary Protraction with or without Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Age Factors in Treating Class III Malocclusion: A Meta-Analysis.

Abstract

We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of 12 studies to examine whether maxillary protraction face mask associated with rapid maxillary expansion (FM/RME) could be an effective treatment for Class III malocclusion and to evaluate the effect of timing on treatment response. Patients with a maxillary deficiency who were treated with FM with or without RME were compared with those who had an untreated Class III malocclusion. In both treatment groups, forward displacement of the maxilla and skeletal changes were found to be statistically significant. In addition, posterior rotation of the mandible and increased facial height were more evident in the FM group compared with the control group. However, no significant differences were observed between the early treatment groups and late treatment groups. The results indicated that both FM/RME and FM therapy produced favorable skeletal changes for correcting anterior crossbite, and the curative time was not affected by the presence of deciduous teeth, early mixed dentition or late mixed dentition in the patient.

• Authors: Wei Zhang, Hong-Chen Qu, Mo Yu, Yang Zhang
• Journal: PloS one (PLoS One) Vol. 10 Issue 6 Pg. e0130096 ( 2015) ISSN: 1932-6203 [Electronic] United States
• PMID: 26068221 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Meta-Analysis)

Topics

• Case-Control Studies
• Extraoral Traction Appliances
• Face (pathology)
• Humans
• Malocclusion, Angle Class III (therapy)
• Masks
• Maxilla (pathology)
• Palatal Expansion Technique