Abstract | BACKGROUND: METHODS: Patients with non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma underwent dynamic imaging with arterial sampling following injection of [(15)O]H2O and [(18)F] fluciclatide. Quantification was performed using a one-tissue compartmental model for [(15)O]H2O and a two-tissue model for [(18)F] fluciclatide at volume-of-interest level, and SUV at voxel level. RESULTS:
Tumor binding potential (k 3/ k 4 ratio) of [(18)F] fluciclatide tumor was 5.39 ± 1.46, consistent with previous studies in breast cancer metastases. Voxel-by-voxel maps of [(18)F] fluciclatide delivery strongly correlated with [(15)O]H2O-based perfusion (p < 10(-4) tumor, 1,794 ± 1,331 voxels). Interestingly, this correlation was lost when retention of [(18)F] fluciclatide at late time-points was compared with perfusion (p > 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests tumor [(18)F] fluciclatide retention is unrelated to tumor perfusion, supporting use of late (60-min) imaging protocols in patients.
|
Authors | Laura M Kenny, Giampaolo Tomasi, Federico Turkheimer, James Larkin, Martin Gore, Cathryn S Brock, Stephen Mangar, Eric O Aboagye |
Journal | EJNMMI research
(EJNMMI Res)
Vol. 4
Issue 1
Pg. 30
(Dec 2014)
ISSN: 2191-219X [Print] Germany |
PMID | 26055935
(Publication Type: Journal Article)
|