HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Octreoscan Versus FDG-PET for Neuroendocrine Tumor Staging: A Biological Approach.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Clinicians may order Octreoscan or positron emission tomography (PET) scan for staging patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). (111)In-Octreoscan (Octreoscan) identifies tumors by radiolabeled targeting of somatostatin receptors, while 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography ((18)FDG-PET) measures differential tissue glucose transport. We assessed the sensitivity of both nuclear imaging modalities with pathologic correlation to define the best initial choice for NET staging after standard cross-sectional imaging.
METHODS:
We identified all patients diagnosed with NETs of gastrointestinal or pancreatic origin who underwent nuclear imaging staging by Octreoscan and/or PET from 2000 to 2013. Imaging results were correlated with tumor differentiation and grade of pathology specimens.
RESULTS:
Imaging and pathology results were identified for 153 patients. Of these, 131 underwent Octreoscan, 43 underwent PET, and 21 patients had both performed. Overall sensitivity of Octreoscan and PET for NET detection was similar (77 vs. 72 %; p = not significant). For well-differentiated NETs, Octreoscan (n = 124) demonstrated sensitivity of 80 vs. 60 % (p = 0.28) for PET (n = 30). For poorly-differentiated NETs, Octreoscan (n = 7) proved significantly less sensitive than PET (n = 13) (57 vs. 100 %; p = 0.02). The sensitivity of Octreoscan versus PET varied similarly when analyzed by WHO tumor grade: Grade 1 (79 vs. 52 %; p = 0.16), Grade 2 (85 vs. 86 %; p = not significant), and Grade 3 (57 vs. 100 %; p = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS:
Tumor differentiation can be used to guide selection of nuclear imaging modalities for staging gastrointestinal and pancreatic NETs. Octreoscan appears more sensitive than (18)FDG-PET for well-differentiated NETs, whereas (18)FDG-PET demonstrates superior sensitivity for poorly-differentiated NETs.
AuthorsMalcolm H Squires 3rd, N Volkan Adsay, David M Schuster, Maria C Russell, Kenneth Cardona, Keith A Delman, Joshua H Winer, Deniz Altinel, Juan M Sarmiento, Bassel El-Rayes, Natalyn Hawk, Charles A Staley 3rd, Shishir K Maithel, David A Kooby
JournalAnnals of surgical oncology (Ann Surg Oncol) Vol. 22 Issue 7 Pg. 2295-301 (Jul 2015) ISSN: 1534-4681 [Electronic] United States
PMID25786743 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Indium Radioisotopes
  • Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
  • Somatostatin
  • pentetreotide
Topics
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Female
  • Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 (pharmacokinetics)
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
  • Indium Radioisotopes (pharmacokinetics)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Grading
  • Neuroendocrine Tumors (diagnostic imaging, mortality, pathology)
  • Positron-Emission Tomography (methods)
  • Prognosis
  • Prospective Studies
  • Radiopharmaceuticals (pharmacokinetics)
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Somatostatin (analogs & derivatives, pharmacokinetics)
  • Survival Rate
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Young Adult

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: