Abstract | PURPOSE: To evaluate the 3-year clinical durability of the flowable bulk-fill resin composite SDR in Class I and Class II restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight pairs of Class I and 62 pairs of Class II restorations were placed in 44 male and 42 female patients (mean age 52.4 years). Each patient received at least two extended Class I or Class II restorations that were as similar as possible. In all cavities, a one-step self-etching adhesive (XenoV+) was applied. One of the cavities of each pair was randomly assigned to receive the flowable bulk-fill resin composite SDR in increments up to 4 mm as needed to fill the cavity 2 mm short of the occlusal cavosurface. The occlusal part was completed with an ormocer-based nanohybrid resin composite ( Ceram X mono+). In the other cavity, only the resin composite CeramX mono+ was placed in 2 mm increments. The restorations were evaluated using slightly modified USPHS criteria at baseline and then annually for 3 years. Caries risk and bruxing habits of the participants were estimated. RESULTS: No post-operative sensitivity was reported. At the 3-year follow-up, 196 restorations - 74 Class I and 122 Class II - were evaluated. Seven restorations failed (3.6%), 4 SDR- CeramX mono+ and 3 CeramX mono+ only restorations, all of which were Class II. The main reason for failure was tooth fracture, followed by resin composite fracture. The annual failure rate (AFR) for all restorations (Class I and II) was 1.2% for the bulkfilled restorations and 1.0% for the resin composite-only restorations (p > 0.05). For the Class II restorations, the AFR was 2.2% and 1.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The 4-mm bulk-fill technique showed good clinical effectiveness during the 3-year follow-up.
|
Authors | Jan Wv van Dijken, Ulla Pallesen |
Journal | The journal of adhesive dentistry
(J Adhes Dent)
Vol. 17
Issue 1
Pg. 81-8
(Feb 2015)
ISSN: 1461-5185 [Print] Germany |
PMID | 25625133
(Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
|
Chemical References |
- CeramX
- Composite Resins
- Dental Cements
- Dental Materials
- Dentin-Bonding Agents
- Methacrylates
- Organically Modified Ceramics
- Polymethacrylic Acids
- Polyurethanes
- Xeno V
- urethane dimethacrylate luting resin
- triethylene glycol dimethacrylate
- Polyethylene Glycols
- ethoxylated bis-phenol A dimethacrylate
|
Topics |
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Color
- Composite Resins
(chemistry)
- Dental Caries
(etiology)
- Dental Cements
(chemistry)
- Dental Marginal Adaptation
- Dental Materials
(chemistry)
- Dental Restoration Failure
- Dental Restoration, Permanent
(classification)
- Dentin-Bonding Agents
(chemistry)
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Male
- Methacrylates
(chemistry)
- Middle Aged
- Nanocomposites
(chemistry)
- Organically Modified Ceramics
(chemistry)
- Polyethylene Glycols
(chemistry)
- Polymethacrylic Acids
(chemistry)
- Polyurethanes
(chemistry)
- Recurrence
- Surface Properties
- Young Adult
|