HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Randomized 3-year clinical evaluation of Class I and II posterior resin restorations placed with a bulk-fill resin composite and a one-step self-etching adhesive.

AbstractPURPOSE:
To evaluate the 3-year clinical durability of the flowable bulk-fill resin composite SDR in Class I and Class II restorations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Thirty-eight pairs of Class I and 62 pairs of Class II restorations were placed in 44 male and 42 female patients (mean age 52.4 years). Each patient received at least two extended Class I or Class II restorations that were as similar as possible. In all cavities, a one-step self-etching adhesive (XenoV+) was applied. One of the cavities of each pair was randomly assigned to receive the flowable bulk-fill resin composite SDR in increments up to 4 mm as needed to fill the cavity 2 mm short of the occlusal cavosurface. The occlusal part was completed with an ormocer-based nanohybrid resin composite (Ceram X mono+). In the other cavity, only the resin composite CeramX mono+ was placed in 2 mm increments. The restorations were evaluated using slightly modified USPHS criteria at baseline and then annually for 3 years. Caries risk and bruxing habits of the participants were estimated.
RESULTS:
No post-operative sensitivity was reported. At the 3-year follow-up, 196 restorations - 74 Class I and 122 Class II - were evaluated. Seven restorations failed (3.6%), 4 SDR-CeramX mono+ and 3 CeramX mono+ only restorations, all of which were Class II. The main reason for failure was tooth fracture, followed by resin composite fracture. The annual failure rate (AFR) for all restorations (Class I and II) was 1.2% for the bulkfilled restorations and 1.0% for the resin composite-only restorations (p > 0.05). For the Class II restorations, the AFR was 2.2% and 1.6%, respectively.
CONCLUSION:
The 4-mm bulk-fill technique showed good clinical effectiveness during the 3-year follow-up.
AuthorsJan Wv van Dijken, Ulla Pallesen
JournalThe journal of adhesive dentistry (J Adhes Dent) Vol. 17 Issue 1 Pg. 81-8 (Feb 2015) ISSN: 1461-5185 [Print] Germany
PMID25625133 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
Chemical References
  • CeramX
  • Composite Resins
  • Dental Cements
  • Dental Materials
  • Dentin-Bonding Agents
  • Methacrylates
  • Organically Modified Ceramics
  • Polymethacrylic Acids
  • Polyurethanes
  • Xeno V
  • urethane dimethacrylate luting resin
  • triethylene glycol dimethacrylate
  • Polyethylene Glycols
  • ethoxylated bis-phenol A dimethacrylate
Topics
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Color
  • Composite Resins (chemistry)
  • Dental Caries (etiology)
  • Dental Cements (chemistry)
  • Dental Marginal Adaptation
  • Dental Materials (chemistry)
  • Dental Restoration Failure
  • Dental Restoration, Permanent (classification)
  • Dentin-Bonding Agents (chemistry)
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Methacrylates (chemistry)
  • Middle Aged
  • Nanocomposites (chemistry)
  • Organically Modified Ceramics (chemistry)
  • Polyethylene Glycols (chemistry)
  • Polymethacrylic Acids (chemistry)
  • Polyurethanes (chemistry)
  • Recurrence
  • Surface Properties
  • Young Adult

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: