HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Increasing varenicline dose in smokers who do not respond to the standard dosage: a randomized clinical trial.

AbstractIMPORTANCE:
Standard varenicline tartrate dosing was formulated to avoid adverse effects (primarily nausea), but some patients may be underdosed. To our knowledge, no evidence-based guidance exists for physicians considering increasing varenicline dose if there is no response to the standard dosage.
OBJECTIVE:
To determine whether increasing varenicline dose in patients showing no response to the standard dosage improves treatment efficacy.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:
In a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial, 503 smokers attending a stop smoking clinic commenced varenicline use 3 weeks before their target quit date (TQD). Two hundred participants reporting no strong nausea, no clear reduction in smoking enjoyment, and less than 50% reduction in their baseline smoking on day 12 received additional tablets of varenicline or placebo.
INTERVENTIONS:
All participants began standard varenicline tartrate dosing, gradually increasing to 2 mg/d. Dose increases of twice-daily varenicline (0.5 mg) or placebo took place on days 12, 15, and 18 (up to a maximum of 5 mg/d).
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES:
Participants rated their smoking enjoyment during the prequit period and withdrawal symptoms weekly for the first 4 weeks after the TQD. Continuous validated abstinence rates were assessed at 1, 4, and 12 weeks after the TQD.
RESULTS:
The dose increase reduced smoking enjoyment during the prequit period, with mean (SD) ratings of 1.7 (0.8) for varenicline vs 2.1 (0.7) for placebo (P = .001). It had no effect on the mean (SD) frequency of urges to smoke at 1 week after the TQD, their strength, or the severity of withdrawal symptoms: these ratings for varenicline vs placebo were 2.7 (1.1) vs 2.6 (0.9) (P = .90), 2.6 (1.1) vs 2.8 (1.0) (P = .36), and 1.5 (0.4) vs 1.6 (0.5) (P = .30), respectively. The dose increase also had no effect on smoking cessation rates for varenicline vs placebo at 1 week (37 [37.0%] vs 48 [48.0%], P = .14), 4 weeks (51 [51.0%] vs 59 [59.0%], P = .32), and 12 weeks (26 [26.0%] vs 23 [23.0%], P = .61) after the TQD. There was significantly more nausea (P < .001) and vomiting (P < .001) reported in the varenicline arm than in the placebo arm.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE:
Increasing varenicline dose in smokers with low response to the drug had no significant effect on tobacco withdrawal symptoms or smoking cessation. Physicians often consider increasing the medication dose if there is no response to the standard dosage. This approach may not work with varenicline.
TRIAL REGISTRATION:
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01206010.
AuthorsPeter Hajek, Hayden McRobbie, Katherine Myers Smith, Anna Phillips, Danielle Cornwall, Al-Rehan Dhanji
JournalJAMA internal medicine (JAMA Intern Med) Vol. 175 Issue 2 Pg. 266-71 (Feb 2015) ISSN: 2168-6114 [Electronic] United States
PMID25545858 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Benzazepines
  • Nicotinic Agonists
  • Quinoxalines
  • Varenicline
Topics
  • Adult
  • Benzazepines (administration & dosage)
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nicotinic Agonists (administration & dosage)
  • Quinoxalines (administration & dosage)
  • Smoking (drug therapy)
  • Smoking Cessation (methods, statistics & numerical data)
  • Treatment Failure
  • Varenicline

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: