HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Management of recurrent hepatitis C virus after liver transplantation.

Abstract
Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the leading cause of death from liver disease and the leading indication for liver transplantation (LT) in the United States and Western Europe. LT represents the best therapeutic alternative for patients with advanced chronic liver disease caused by HCV or those who develop hepatocarcinoma. Reinfection by HCV of the graft is universal and occurs in 95% of transplant patients. This reinfection can compromise graft function and patient survival. In a few cases, the histological recurrence is minimal and non-progressive; however, in most patients it follows a more rapid course than in immunocompetent persons, and frequently evolves into cirrhosis with graft loss. In fact, the five-year and ten-year survival of patients transplanted because of HCV are 75% and 68%, respectively, compared with 85% and 78% in patients transplanted for other reasons. There is also a pattern of recurrence that is very severe, but rare (< 10%), called fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis, which often involves rapid graft loss. Patients who present a negative HCV viremia after antiviral treatment have better survival. Many studies published over recent years have shown that antiviral treatment of post-transplant HCV hepatitis carried out during the late phase is the best option for improving the prognosis of these patients. Until 2011, PEGylated interferon plus ribavirin was the standard of care, resulting in a sustained virological response in around 30% of recipients. The addition of protease inhibitors, such as boceprevir or telaprevir, to the standard of care, or the use of other direct-acting antiviral drugs may involve therapeutic changes in the context of HCV recurrence. This may result a better prognosis for these patients, particularly those with severe recurrence or factors predicting rapid progression of fibrosis. However, the use of these agents in LT still requires clarification in terms of safety and efficacy.
AuthorsMiguel Jiménez-Pérez, Rocío González-Grande, Francisco Javier Rando-Muñoz
JournalWorld journal of gastroenterology (World J Gastroenterol) Vol. 20 Issue 44 Pg. 16409-17 (Nov 28 2014) ISSN: 2219-2840 [Electronic] United States
PMID25469009 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Review)
Chemical References
  • Antiviral Agents
  • Immunosuppressive Agents
Topics
  • Antiviral Agents (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Carcinoma, Hepatocellular (diagnosis, mortality, surgery, virology)
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • End Stage Liver Disease (diagnosis, mortality, surgery, virology)
  • Hepatitis C, Chronic (complications, diagnosis, drug therapy, immunology, mortality)
  • Humans
  • Immunocompromised Host
  • Immunosuppressive Agents (adverse effects)
  • Liver Neoplasms (diagnosis, mortality, surgery, virology)
  • Liver Transplantation (adverse effects, mortality)
  • Recurrence
  • Risk Factors
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: