HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

In-flight auscultation during medical air evacuation: comparison between traditional and amplified stethoscopes.

AbstractOBJECTIVES:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the capacity of a traditional stethoscope versus an electronically amplified one (expected to reduce background and ambient noise) to assess heart and respiratory sounds during medical transport.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
It was a prospective, double-blinded, randomized performed study. One traditional stethoscope (Littmann Cardiology III; 3M, St Paul, MN) and 1 electronically amplified stethoscope (Littmann 3200, 3M) were used for our tests. Heart and lung auscultation during real medical evacuations aboard a medically configured Falcon 50 aircrafts were studied. The quality of auscultation was ranged using a numeric rating scale from 0 to 10 (0 corresponding to "I hear nothing" and 10 to "I hear perfectly"). Data collected were compared using a t-test for paired values.
RESULTS:
A total of 40 comparative evaluations were performed. For cardiac auscultation, the value of the rating scale was 4.53 ± 1.91 and 7.18 ± 1.88 for the traditional and amplified stethoscope, respectively (paired t-test: P < .0001). For respiratory sounds, quality of auscultation was estimated at 3.1 ± 1.95 for a traditional stethoscope and 5.10 ± 2.13 for the amplified one (paired t-test: P < .0001).
CONCLUSIONS:
This study showed that practitioners would be better helped in hearing cardiac and respiratory sounds with an electronically amplified stethoscope than with a traditional one during air medical transport in a medically configured Falcon 50 aircraft.
AuthorsEmmanuelle Fontaine, Sébastien Coste, Chrystelle Poyat, Céline Klein, Hugues Lefort, Thomas Leclerc, Stéphane Dubourdieu, Frédérique Briche, Daniel Jost, Olga Maurin, Laurent Domanski, Jean-Pierre Tourtier
JournalAir medical journal (Air Med J) 2014 Nov-Dec Vol. 33 Issue 6 Pg. 283-5 ISSN: 1532-6497 [Electronic] United States
PMID25441521 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
CopyrightCopyright © 2014 Air Medical Journal Associates. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Topics
  • Adult
  • Air Ambulances
  • Auscultation (instrumentation)
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lung
  • Male
  • Prospective Studies
  • Stethoscopes
  • Young Adult

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: