Abstract | OBJECTIVE: Is conscious sedation an effective, safe, and efficient anesthetic choice in patients undergoing select neurotologic and otologic procedures? STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: INTERVENTION: MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and Morbidity (P-POSSUM) scores were calculated for the study group. We measured total anesthesia, and perioperative and recovery times. Cost of anesthetic agents was considered and any adverse effects were noted. Patient satisfaction with the operative experience was assessed with telephone surveys. RESULTS: P-POSSUM scores were high for the study group. Postoperative anesthesia was shorter for the study patients undergoing conscious sedation. Difference in cost of anesthetic agents was negligible. The adverse effects were few and as expected for the type of procedure. Patients reported satisfaction and comfort with their operative experience. CONCLUSION:
|
Authors | Maja Svrakic, Aron Pollack, T Kate Huncke, J Thomas Roland Jr |
Journal | Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology
(Otol Neurotol)
Vol. 35
Issue 10
Pg. e277-85
(Dec 2014)
ISSN: 1537-4505 [Electronic] United States |
PMID | 25226374
(Publication Type: Journal Article)
|
Chemical References |
|
Topics |
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Anesthesia, Local
- Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak
(surgery)
- Conscious Sedation
- Encephalocele
(surgery)
- Female
- Humans
- Hypnotics and Sedatives
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Neurosurgical Procedures
(methods)
- Otologic Surgical Procedures
(methods)
- Patient Satisfaction
- Reoperation
- Retrospective Studies
- Treatment Outcome
|