HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Inclusion of endogenous hormone levels in risk prediction models of postmenopausal breast cancer.

AbstractPURPOSE:
Endogenous hormones are risk factors for postmenopausal breast cancer, and their measurement may improve our ability to identify high-risk women. Therefore, we evaluated whether inclusion of plasma estradiol, estrone, estrone sulfate, testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, prolactin, and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) improved risk prediction for postmenopausal invasive breast cancer (n = 437 patient cases and n = 775 controls not using postmenopausal hormones) in the Nurses' Health Study.
METHODS:
We evaluated improvement in the area under the curve (AUC) for 5-year risk of invasive breast cancer by adding each hormone to the Gail and Rosner-Colditz risk scores. We used stepwise regression to identify the subset of hormones most associated with risk and assessed AUC improvement; we used 10-fold cross validation to assess model overfitting.
RESULTS:
Each hormone was associated with breast cancer risk (odds ratio doubling, 0.82 [SHBG] to 1.37 [estrone sulfate]). Individual hormones improved the AUC by 1.3 to 5.2 units relative to the Gail score and 0.3 to 2.9 for the Rosner-Colditz score. Estrone sulfate, testosterone, and prolactin were selected by stepwise regression and increased the AUC by 5.9 units (P = .003) for the Gail score and 3.4 (P = .04) for the Rosner-Colditz score. In cross validation, the average AUC change across the validation data sets was 6.0 (P = .002) and 3.0 units (P = .03), respectively. Similar results were observed for estrogen receptor-positive disease (selected hormones: estrone sulfate, testosterone, prolactin, and SHBG; change in AUC, 8.8 [P < .001] for Gail score and 5.8 [P = .004] for Rosner-Colditz score).
CONCLUSION:
Our results support that endogenous hormones improve risk prediction for invasive breast cancer and could help identify women who may benefit from chemoprevention or more screening.
AuthorsShelley S Tworoger, Xuehong Zhang, A Heather Eliassen, Jing Qian, Graham A Colditz, Walter C Willett, Bernard A Rosner, Peter Kraft, Susan E Hankinson
JournalJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (J Clin Oncol) Vol. 32 Issue 28 Pg. 3111-7 (Oct 01 2014) ISSN: 1527-7755 [Electronic] United States
PMID25135988 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural)
Copyright© 2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Chemical References
  • Hormones
  • Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin
  • Estrone
  • Testosterone
  • Estradiol
  • Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate
  • Prolactin
  • estrone sulfate
Topics
  • Aged
  • Breast Neoplasms (blood, diagnosis)
  • Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate (blood)
  • Estradiol (blood)
  • Estrone (analogs & derivatives, blood)
  • Female
  • Hormones (blood)
  • Humans
  • Logistic Models
  • Middle Aged
  • Models, Statistical
  • Postmenopause (blood)
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Prognosis
  • Prolactin (blood)
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Risk Assessment (methods, statistics & numerical data)
  • Risk Factors
  • Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin (metabolism)
  • Testosterone (blood)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: