HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Clinical activity of enzalutamide versus docetaxel in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after abiraterone.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
The optimal sequencing of the multiple active agents now available for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is unclear. Prior reports have suggested diminished responses to sequential lines of androgen receptor (AR)-targeted therapies, but it is unknown whether subsequent taxane-based chemotherapy may be more effective than sequential AR-targeting treatment. We sought to evaluate the clinical activity of enzalutamide versus docetaxel in men with mCRPC who progressed on abiraterone.
METHODS:
We performed a single-institution retrospective analysis of consecutive mCRPC patients who had progressed on abiraterone therapy and subsequently received either enzalutamide (n=30) or docetaxel (n=31). We evaluated clinical outcomes including prostate-specific antigen decline of >30% (PSA30) or >50% (PSA50), PSA-progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), and clinical/radiographic PFS. We performed multivariable modeling to control for baseline and on-treatment differences between groups.
RESULTS:
Compared to subjects who received enzalutamide post-abiraterone, subjects who received docetaxel post-abiraterone had more bone metastases, more visceral metastases, higher baseline PSA, and had more frequent PSA tests while on-treatment. There were no significant differences in PSA30 (41% for enzalutamide vs. 53% for docetaxel) or PSA50 (34% vs. 40%) response rates between the two groups; there remained no difference after stratifying by presence/absence of prior response to abiraterone. Median PSA-PFS was 4.1 versus 4.1 months for the enzalutamide and docetaxel cohorts, respectively (HR 1.35, 95% CI, 0.53-3.66, P=0.502). Median PFS was 4.7 versus 4.4 months, respectively (HR 1.44, 95% CI, 0.77-2.71, P=0.257). PSA-PFS and PFS did not differ after stratifying by prior response to abiraterone. In multivariable analyses, there were no significant differences in PSA-PFS or PFS between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS:
Treatment with either enzalutamide or docetaxel produced modest PSA responses and PFS intervals in this abiraterone-pretreated mCRPC population. In this retrospective study with small sample size, no significant differences in outcomes were observed between groups. Therefore, either enzalutamide or docetaxel may be a reasonable option in men who have progressed on abiraterone.
AuthorsDaniel L Suzman, Brandon Luber, Michael T Schweizer, Rosa Nadal, Emmanuel S Antonarakis
JournalThe Prostate (Prostate) Vol. 74 Issue 13 Pg. 1278-85 (Sep 2014) ISSN: 1097-0045 [Electronic] United States
PMID25053178 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article)
Copyright© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Chemical References
  • Androstenes
  • Androstenols
  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • Benzamides
  • Nitriles
  • Taxoids
  • Docetaxel
  • Phenylthiohydantoin
  • enzalutamide
  • abiraterone
Topics
  • Adenocarcinoma (drug therapy, secondary)
  • Aged
  • Androstenes
  • Androstenols (therapeutic use)
  • Antineoplastic Agents (therapeutic use)
  • Benzamides
  • Bone Neoplasms (drug therapy, secondary)
  • Disease Progression
  • Docetaxel
  • Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nitriles
  • Phenylthiohydantoin (analogs & derivatives, therapeutic use)
  • Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant (drug therapy)
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Taxoids (therapeutic use)
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: