HOMEPRODUCTSSERVICESCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaMobileSign Up FREE or Login

Mesalamine did not prevent recurrent diverticulitis in phase 3 controlled trials.

AbstractBACKGROUND & AIMS:
No therapy has been proven to prevent the recurrence of diverticulitis. Mesalamine has shown efficacy in preventing relapse in inflammatory bowel disease, and there is preliminary evidence that it might be effective for diverticular disease. We investigated the efficacy of mesalamine in preventing recurrence of diverticulitis in 2 identical but separate phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trials (identical confirmatory trials were conducted for regulatory reasons).
METHODS:
We evaluated the efficacy and safety of multimatrix mesalamine vs placebo in the prevention of recurrent diverticulitis in 590 (PREVENT1) and 592 (PREVENT2) adult patients with ≥1 episodes of acute diverticulitis in the previous 24 months that resolved without surgery. Patients received mesalamine (1.2 g, 2.4 g, or 4.8 g) or placebo once daily for 104 weeks. The primary end point was the proportion of recurrence-free patients at week 104. Diverticulitis recurrence was defined as surgical intervention at any time for diverticular disease or presence of computed tomography scan results demonstrating bowel wall thickening (>5 mm) and/or fat stranding consistent with diverticulitis. For a portion of the study, recurrence also required the presence of abdominal pain and an increase in white blood cells.
RESULTS:
Mesalamine did not reduce the rate of diverticulitis recurrence at week 104. Among patients in PREVENT1, 53%-63% did not have disease recurrence, compared with 65% of those given placebo. Among patients in PREVENT2, 59%-69% of patients did not have disease recurrence, compared with 68% of those given placebo. Mesalamine did not reduce time to recurrence, and the proportions of patients requiring surgery were comparable among treatment groups. No new adverse events were identified with mesalamine administration.
CONCLUSIONS:
Mesalamine was not superior to placebo in preventing recurrent diverticulitis. Mesalamine is not recommended for this indication. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT00545740 and NCT00545103.
AuthorsJeffrey B Raskin, Michael A Kamm, M Mazen Jamal, Juan Márquez, Ehud Melzer, Robert E Schoen, Tibor Szalóki, Karen Barrett, Paul Streck
JournalGastroenterology (Gastroenterology) Vol. 147 Issue 4 Pg. 793-802 (Oct 2014) ISSN: 1528-0012 [Electronic] United States
PMID25038431 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Phase III, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
CopyrightCopyright © 2014 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chemical References
  • Anti-Inflammatory Agents
  • Gastrointestinal Agents
  • Mesalamine
Topics
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Anti-Inflammatory Agents (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Colectomy
  • Colonic Diseases (diagnosis, drug therapy, surgery)
  • Diverticulitis (diagnosis, drug therapy, surgery)
  • Female
  • Gastrointestinal Agents (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mesalamine (therapeutic use)
  • Middle Aged
  • Secondary Prevention
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • United States

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research network!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password: