HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Depression drug treatment outcomes in pregnancy and the postpartum period: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AbstractOBJECTIVE:
To evaluate the comparative benefits and harms in both mother and child of antidepressant treatment for depression in pregnant or postpartum women.
DATA SOURCES:
MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov (inception to July 2013), manufacturers, and reference lists.
METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION:
Two reviewers independently selected studies of pregnant women with depression comparing antidepressants with each other, placebo or no treatment, or nondrug treatments. Studies making comparisons among women taking antidepressants for any reason and those not taking antidepressants (depression status unknown) were used to fill gaps in the evidence.
TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS:
Dual study data extraction and quality assessment were used. Six randomized controlled trials and 15 observational studies provided evidence. Low-strength evidence suggested neonates of pregnant women with depression taking selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors had higher risk of respiratory distress than did neonates of untreated women (13.9% compared with 7.8%; P<.001) but no difference in risk of neonatal convulsions (0.14% compared with 0.11%; P=.64) or preterm birth (17% compared with 10%; P=.07). Indirect evidence from studies of pregnant women receiving antidepressants for mixed or unreported reasons compared with pregnant women not taking antidepressants (depression status unknown) suggested future research should focus on congenital anomalies and autism spectrum and attention deficit disorders in the child. In postpartum depression, low-strength evidence suggested symptom response was not improved when sertraline was added to psychotherapy or when cognitive-behavioral therapy was added to paroxetine. Evidence was insufficient for other outcomes, including depression symptoms, functional capacity, breastfeeding, and infant and child development. A serious limitation is the lack of study populations of exclusively depressed pregnant and postpartum women.
CONCLUSION:
Evidence about the comparative benefits and harms of pharmacologic treatment of depression in pregnant and postpartum women was largely inadequate to allow informed decisions about treatment. Considering the prevalence of depression, filling this gap is essential.
AuthorsMarian S McDonagh, Annette Matthews, Carrie Phillipi, Jillian Romm, Kim Peterson, Sujata Thakurta, Jeanne-Marie Guise
JournalObstetrics and gynecology (Obstet Gynecol) Vol. 124 Issue 3 Pg. 526-534 (Sep 2014) ISSN: 1873-233X [Electronic] United States
PMID25004304 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S., Review, Systematic Review)
Chemical References
  • Antidepressive Agents
Topics
  • Antidepressive Agents (administration & dosage, adverse effects, classification)
  • Breast Feeding (adverse effects)
  • Comparative Effectiveness Research
  • Depression, Postpartum (drug therapy)
  • Depressive Disorder (drug therapy)
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Observational Studies as Topic
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy Complications (drug therapy)
  • Pregnancy Outcome
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: