The aim of this study was to obtain best estimates of the efficacy and safety of
cilostazol-based triple antiplatelet
therapy (
TAPT:
aspirin,
clopidogrel and
cilostazol) compared with dual antiplatelet
therapy (
DAPT:
aspirin and
clopidogrel) in patients undergoing coronary
stent implantation. We searched the literature to identify all randomized clinical trials examining efficacy and safety of
TAPT versus
DAPT in patients undergoing coronary
stent implantation. Major efficacy outcomes were death, non-fatal
myocardial infarction (MI),
ischemic stroke and
stent thrombosis (ST) and the safety outcome was
bleeding. Data were analyzed using the Review Manager 5.0.0 software. A total of 19 trials involving 7,464 patients were included.
TAPT and
DAPT were associated with similar rates of death, non-fatal MI,
ischemic stroke and ST, but compared with
DAPT,
TAPT had lower rates of target lesion revascularization (TLR) (RR 0.67, 95 % CI 0.56-0.82, P < 0.0001) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) (RR 0.65, 95 % CI 0.55-0.77, P < 0.00001), as well as less late loss of minimal lumen diameter (mean difference -0.14, 95 % CI -0.17--0.11, P < 0.00001), and less binary angiographic restenosis (RR 0.54, 95 % CI 0.45-0.65, P < 0.00001).
TAPT and
DAPT had similar rates of
bleeding, but
TAPT had significantly higher rates of
headache, palpitation,
rash and gastrointestinal side-effects.
Cilostazol-based
TAPT compared with
DAPT is associated with improved angiographic outcomes and decreased risk of TLR and TVR but does not reduce major cardiovascular events and is associated with an increase in minor adverse events.