HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Paddle versus cylindrical leads for percutaneous implantation in spinal cord stimulation for failed back surgery syndrome: a single-center trial.

AbstractOBJECTIVE:
Spinal cord stimulation is an interventional treatment for chronic pain syndromes such as failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS), and it utilizes either cylindrical or paddle electrodes placed percutaneously into the epidural space. This prospective nonrandomized single-center study investigated the specific advantages and disadvantages of percutaneously implanted paddle and cylindrical leads in patients with FBSS.
METHODS:
Over a 2-year period, 100 patients with FBSS (43 men; 57 women; mean age: 56.3 years) were included. Paddle leads were placed percutaneously under local anesthesia in 50 patients; conventional percutaneous cylindrical lead implantation was performed in the other 50 patients (one lead permitted per patient). Follow-up included the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) assessment of pain and administration of the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire.
RESULTS:
Similar significant pain reduction (69%) was demonstrated in both groups (VAS pre/post: paddle: 8.8/3.7; cylindrical: 8.5/3.8). Using the same perioperative protocol for each group, we observed higher dislocation and infection rates for the cylindrical group (14% and 10%, respectively) than for the paddle group (6% and 2%, respectively).
CONCLUSION:
Minimally invasive percutaneous paddle and cylindrical leads are safe and effective, have low complication rates, and perform well in patients with FBSS. Both devices can be implanted using a local anesthetic, so that intraoperative and reproducible testing stimulation can be performed for sufficient paresthesia overlap prior to permanent device fixation.
AuthorsThomas M Kinfe, Florian Quack, Christian Wille, Stefan Schu, Jan Vesper
JournalJournal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery (J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg) Vol. 75 Issue 6 Pg. 467-73 (Nov 2014) ISSN: 2193-6323 [Electronic] Germany
PMID24793061 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article)
CopyrightGeorg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Topics
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Cohort Studies
  • Electrodes, Implanted
  • Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (therapy)
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Spinal Cord Stimulation (instrumentation, methods)
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: