HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

A randomized study of lubiprostone for opioid-induced constipation in patients with chronic noncancer pain.

AbstractOBJECTIVE:
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral lubiprostone for relieving symptoms of opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in patients with chronic noncancer pain.
DESIGN:
Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
SETTING:
Seventy-nine US and Canadian centers.
SUBJECTS:
Patients aged ≥ 18 years with OIC, defined as <3 spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) per week.
METHODS:
Patients received lubiprostone 24 mcg or placebo twice daily for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in SBM frequency at week 8.
RESULTS:
Among randomized patients (N=418; lubiprostone, N=210; placebo, N=208), most completed the study (lubiprostone, 67.1%; placebo, 69.7%). The safety and efficacy (intent-to-treat) populations included 414 (lubiprostone, N=208; placebo, N=206) and 413 (lubiprostone, N=209; placebo, N=204) patients, respectively. The mean (standard deviation) age was 50.4 (10.9) years; most patients were female (64.4%) and white (77.7%). Changes from baseline in SBM frequency rates were significantly higher at week 8 (P=0.005) and overall (P=0.004) in patients treated with lubiprostone compared with placebo. Pairwise comparisons showed significantly greater overall improvement for abdominal discomfort (P=0.047), straining (P<0.001), constipation severity (P=0.007), and stool consistency (P<0.001) with lubiprostone compared with placebo. Moreover, patients rated the effectiveness of lubiprostone as significantly (P<0.05) better than placebo for 11 of 12 weeks. The most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) with lubiprostone and placebo were nausea (16.8% vs 5.8%, respectively), diarrhea (9.6% vs 2.9%), and abdominal distention (8.2% vs 2.4%). No lubiprostone-related serious AEs occurred.
CONCLUSION:
Lubiprostone effectively relieved OIC and associated signs and symptoms and was well tolerated in patients with chronic noncancer pain (http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00595946).
AuthorsByron Cryer, Seymour Katz, Ricardo Vallejo, Anca Popescu, Ryuji Ueno
JournalPain medicine (Malden, Mass.) (Pain Med) Vol. 15 Issue 11 Pg. 1825-34 (Nov 2014) ISSN: 1526-4637 [Electronic] England
PMID24716835 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Phase III, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Copyright© 2014 The Authors. Pain Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Academy of Pain Medicine.
Chemical References
  • Analgesics, Opioid
  • Chloride Channel Agonists
  • Lubiprostone
  • Alprostadil
Topics
  • Alprostadil (analogs & derivatives, therapeutic use)
  • Analgesics, Opioid (adverse effects)
  • Chloride Channel Agonists (therapeutic use)
  • Chronic Pain (drug therapy)
  • Constipation (chemically induced, drug therapy)
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lubiprostone
  • Male
  • Middle Aged

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: