HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Urinary 1-methylhistidine and 3-methylhistidine, meat intake, and colorectal adenoma risk.

Abstract
Self-reported red and processed meat intake has been positively associated with colorectal adenoma and cancer; however, measurement error in self-reported data can attenuate risk estimates, increasing the need for improved exposure assessment methods to better understand this association. A controlled feeding study revealed that urinary 1-methylhistidine and 3-methylhistidine levels were dose-dependently associated with meat intake; our aim was to examine these analytes in relation to colorectal adenoma. Individuals undergoing routine cancer screening by sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy were recruited for a colorectal adenoma case-control study; participants completed a food frequency questionnaire and a meat questionnaire, and donated urine. Urinary 1-methylhistidine and 3-methylhistidine levels were measured in 131 case-control pairs (age, sex, and smoking matched); odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by logistic regression. Although the mean self-reported red meat intake was higher in cases (59 g/day) than in controls (48 g/day), the mean urinary 1-methylhistidine and 3-methylhistidine levels did not differ by case status (P=0.72). Neither urinary 1-methylhistidine nor urinary 3-methylhistidine was associated with colorectal adenoma (OR continuous=0.90, 95% CI: 0.53-1.54; OR continuous=0.90, 95% CI: 0.69-1.17, respectively). A variable combining self-reported red meat intake with urinary 1-methylhistidine and 3-methylhistidine levels was not associated with colorectal adenoma. Analyzing urine samples from multiple days from 17 individuals revealed intraclass correlations of 0.52 and 0.49 for 1-methylhistidine and 3-methylhistidine, respectively; this variability could result in attenuated risks. Urinary 1-methylhistidine and 3-methylhistidine levels, measured in one sample, were not associated with colorectal adenoma.
AuthorsAmanda J Cross, Jacqueline M Major, Nathaniel Rothman, Rashmi Sinha
JournalEuropean journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) (Eur J Cancer Prev) Vol. 23 Issue 5 Pg. 385-90 (Sep 2014) ISSN: 1473-5709 [Electronic] England
PMID24681531 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural)
Chemical References
  • Biomarkers, Tumor
  • Methylhistidines
  • 1-methylhistidine
  • 3-methylhistidine
Topics
  • Adenoma (diagnosis, etiology, urine)
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Biomarkers, Tumor (urine)
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Colorectal Neoplasms (diagnosis, etiology, urine)
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Meat (adverse effects)
  • Methylhistidines (urine)
  • Middle Aged
  • Odds Ratio
  • Prognosis
  • Risk Factors
  • Young Adult

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: