HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Externally removable stents in the treatment of benign recalcitrant strictures and esophageal perforations in pediatric patients with esophageal atresia.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
We investigated whether removable stents, such as self-expandable plastic stents (SEPSs) and fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMSs) could provide an alternative treatment for recalcitrant strictures and esophageal perforations after esophageal atresia (EA) repair.
OBJECTIVE:
The primary aim of our study was to evaluate technical feasibility. Secondary aims were to evaluate safety and procedural success.
DESIGN:
Retrospective study.
SETTING:
Tertiary-care referral center.
PATIENTS:
A total of 24 children with EA.
INTERVENTIONS:
Retrospective review of all children with EA who underwent dilation and esophageal stent placement from January 2010 to February 2013 at our institution.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS:
Healing of perforation and stricture resolution at 30 and 90 days.
RESULTS:
A total of 41 stents (SEPSs 14, FCSEMSs 27) were placed in 24 patients with EA during the study period, including 14 who had developed esophageal leaks. Procedural success of esophageal stent placement in the treatment of refractory strictures was 39% at 30 days and 26% at 90 days. The success rate was 80% for closure of esophageal perforations with stent therapy after dilation and 25% for perforations associated with surgical repair. Adverse events of stent placement included migration (21% of SEPSs and 7% of FCSEMSs), granulation tissue (37% of FCSEMSs), and deep ulcerations (22% of FCSEMSs).
LIMITATIONS:
Retrospective study with small sample size.
CONCLUSION:
SEPSs and FCSEMSs can be placed successfully in small infants and children with a history of EA repair. The stents appear to be safe and beneficial in closing esophageal perforations, especially post-dilation. However, a high stricture recurrence rate after stent removal may limit their usefulness in treating recalcitrant esophageal anastomotic strictures.
AuthorsMichael A Manfredi, Russell W Jennings, M Waseem Anjum, Thomas E Hamilton, C Jason Smithers, Jenifer R Lightdale
JournalGastrointestinal endoscopy (Gastrointest Endosc) Vol. 80 Issue 2 Pg. 246-52 (Aug 2014) ISSN: 1097-6779 [Electronic] United States
PMID24650853 (Publication Type: Journal Article)
CopyrightCopyright © 2014 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Topics
  • Anastomosis, Surgical (adverse effects)
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Dilatation (adverse effects)
  • Equipment Design
  • Esophageal Atresia (surgery)
  • Esophageal Perforation (etiology, therapy)
  • Esophageal Stenosis (etiology, therapy)
  • Esophagus (surgery)
  • Female
  • Granulation Tissue
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Male
  • Prosthesis Failure
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Stents (adverse effects)
  • Ulcer (etiology)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: