Abstract | BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: METHODS: RESULTS: A total of 272 enrolled cases were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis and safety analysis. There were no differences in demographics and baseline medical characteristics between biapenem group and meropenem group. The overall clinical efficacies of biapenem and meropenem were not significantly different, 94.70 per cent (125/132) vs. 93.94 per cent (124/132). The overall bacterial eradication rates of biapenem and meropenem showed no significant difference, 96.39 per cent (80/83) vs. 93.75 per cent (75/80). Drug-related adverse reactions were comparable in biapenem and meropenem groups with the incidence of 11.76 per cent (16/136) and 15.44 per cent (21/136), respectively. The most common symptoms of biapenem-related adverse reactions were rash (2.2%) and gastrointestinal distress (1.5%). INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS:
|
Authors | Xiaohui Wang, Xiaoke Zhang, Zhiyong Zong, Rujia Yu, Xiaoju Lv, Jianbao Xin, Chaohui Tong, Qinglin Hao, Zhiqiang Qin, Ying Xiong, Hong Liu, Guohua Ding, Chengping Hu, Biapenem Study Collaborative Group |
Journal | The Indian journal of medical research
(Indian J Med Res)
Vol. 138
Issue 6
Pg. 995-1002
(Dec 2013)
ISSN: 0971-5916 [Print] India |
PMID | 24521647
(Publication Type: Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
|
Chemical References |
- Thienamycins
- Meropenem
- biapenem
|
Topics |
- Adult
- Aged
- Bacteria
(drug effects)
- Bacterial Infections
(drug therapy, microbiology)
- China
- Female
- Humans
- Infusions, Intravenous
- Male
- Meropenem
- Middle Aged
- Respiratory Tract Infections
(drug therapy, microbiology, pathology)
- Thienamycins
(administration & dosage, adverse effects)
- Urinary Tract Infections
(drug therapy, microbiology, pathology)
|