Abstract | PURPOSE: MATERIALS AND METHODS: RESULTS: Compared to 3D-CRT, cumulative excess absolute risks (EAR) for t-IMRT, m-IMRT and VMAT were increased by 2 ± 15%, 131 ± 85%, 123 ± 66% for the linear-exponential risk model, 9 ± 22%, 82 ± 96%, 71 ± 82% for the linear and 3 ± 14%, 123 ± 78%, 113 ± 61% for the plateau model, respectively. CONCLUSION:
Second cancer risk after 3D-CRT or t-IMRT is lower than for m-IMRT or VMAT by about 34% for the linear model and 50% for the linear-exponential and plateau models, respectively.
|
Authors | Yasser Abo-Madyan, Muhammad Hammad Aziz, Moamen M O M Aly, Frank Schneider, Elena Sperk, Sven Clausen, Frank A Giordano, Carsten Herskind, Volker Steil, Frederik Wenz, Gerhard Glatting |
Journal | Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
(Radiother Oncol)
Vol. 110
Issue 3
Pg. 471-6
(Mar 2014)
ISSN: 1879-0887 [Electronic] Ireland |
PMID | 24444525
(Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
|
Copyright | Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. |
Topics |
- Aged
- Breast Neoplasms
(radiotherapy)
- Female
- Humans
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced
- Neoplasms, Second Primary
(etiology)
- Radiotherapy Dosage
- Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
(methods)
- Radiotherapy, Conformal
(adverse effects)
- Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
(adverse effects)
- Risk
|