HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Maropitant prevented vomiting but not gastroesophageal reflux in anesthetized dogs premedicated with acepromazine-hydromorphone.

AbstractOBJECTIVE:
To evaluate the efficacy of maropitant for prevention of vomiting and gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in dogs following acepromazine-hydromorphone premedication and inhalation anesthesia.
STUDY DESIGN:
Randomized, blinded, prospective clinical study.
ANIMALS:
Twenty-six dogs admitted for elective soft tissue or orthopedic procedures that were 3.1 ±3.1 years of age and weighed 20.5 ± 11.4 kg.
METHODS:
Dogs were randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group M received maropitant (1.0 mg kg(-1) ) and Group S received 0.9% saline (0.1 mL kg(-1) ) intravenously 45-60 minutes before premedication with hydromorphone (0.1 mg kg(-1) ) and acepromazine (0.03 mg kg(-1) ) intramuscularly. An observer blinded to treatment documented any retching or vomiting for 20 minutes before induction with propofol (2-6 mg kg(-1) ) and inhalation anesthesia. A pH probe inserted into the distal esophagus was used to detect GER.
RESULTS:
None of the dogs in Group M retched or vomited (0/13), 6/13 (46%) in Group S were observed to retch or vomit, and the difference between groups was significant (p = 0.015). There were no differences between groups in the number of dogs with GER (Group M: 4/13, Group S: 6/13 dogs) or the number of reflux events. Esophageal pH at the end of anesthesia was significantly lower in both M and S groups in dogs with GER versus dogs without GER (p = 0.004 and 0.011, respectively). Only dogs with GER in Group S had significantly lower pH at the end compared to the beginning of anesthesia (p = 0.004).
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE:
Intravenous maropitant prevented retching and vomiting associated with acepromazine-hydromorphone premedication. Maropitant did not prevent the occurrence of GER. Fewer dogs in Group M developed GER but further study with a larger number of dogs is necessary to determine if there is a significant difference.
AuthorsRebecca A Johnson
JournalVeterinary anaesthesia and analgesia (Vet Anaesth Analg) Vol. 41 Issue 4 Pg. 406-10 (Jul 2014) ISSN: 1467-2995 [Electronic] United States
PMID24330310 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Copyright© 2013 Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists and the American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia.
Chemical References
  • Analgesics, Opioid
  • Antiemetics
  • Dopamine Antagonists
  • Quinuclidines
  • maropitant
  • Acepromazine
  • Hydromorphone
Topics
  • Acepromazine (administration & dosage, adverse effects)
  • Analgesics, Opioid (administration & dosage, adverse effects)
  • Anesthesia, Inhalation (adverse effects, veterinary)
  • Animals
  • Antiemetics (administration & dosage, pharmacology)
  • Dog Diseases (chemically induced, prevention & control)
  • Dogs
  • Dopamine Antagonists (administration & dosage, adverse effects)
  • Esophagus
  • Female
  • Gastroesophageal Reflux (chemically induced, prevention & control, veterinary)
  • Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
  • Hydromorphone (administration & dosage, adverse effects)
  • Male
  • Quinuclidines (administration & dosage, pharmacology)
  • Vomiting (chemically induced, prevention & control, veterinary)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: