HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Complications in dual chamber pacing: a six-year experience.

Abstract
In a six-year period (1980-1985), 345 dual chamber pacing systems were implanted in our hospital. Intraoperative complications were rare (n = 5/345 = 1.4%). 25 patients (7%) have died, 11 (3%) were lost to follow-up. A total of 39 patients (13%) showed minor problems, which could be overcome by reprogramming. Another 48 complications (15%) required reoperation. Nearly 70% of those reoperations (n = 31/48) were caused by a malfunction of the atrial lead. This high complication rate of 9% related to all implanted atrial leads could be reduced in the last three years to 2%. We could maintain a dual chamber stimulation mode (DDD, DDI, DVI, VDD) in 396 patients (99%). We conclude that improvements in lead design, pulse generator's programmability, and surgical experience have reduced complication rates to acceptable low values. Meanwhile, dual chamber pacing can be considered as safe as single chamber pacemaker therapy.
AuthorsA Markewitz, W Hemmer, C Weinhold
JournalPacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE (Pacing Clin Electrophysiol) Vol. 9 Issue 6 Pg. 1014-8 (Nov 1986) ISSN: 0147-8389 [Print] United States
PMID2432502 (Publication Type: Journal Article)
Topics
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Arrhythmias, Cardiac (etiology, therapy)
  • Child
  • Electrodes
  • Female
  • Heart Atria
  • Heart Ventricles
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pacemaker, Artificial (adverse effects)
  • Reoperation

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: