HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

The value of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in determining antihypertensive benefit: observations from the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT).

Abstract
We investigated 3 hypotheses: (1) N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) predicts cardiovascular disease events in patients with hypertension, (2) NT-proBNP is associated with blood pressure variability, and (3) NT-proBNP predicts benefit from antihypertensive regimens. The Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT) randomized a subset of 6549 patients at risk with no history of coronary heart disease to either atenolol-based or amlodipine-based blood pressure-lowering treatment. During 5.5 years of follow-up, 485 cardiovascular disease cases accrued and were matched with 1367 controls. Baseline and 6-month in-trial NT-proBNP were measured. The results show that NT-proBNP improves cardiovascular disease risk prediction beyond established predictors, continuous net reclassification improvement of 22.3% (P<0.0001). Furthermore, a 1-mm Hg increase in the SD of systolic blood pressure was associated with 2% higher baseline NT-proBNP in a multivariable regression analysis (P<0.0001). However, NT-proBNP predicted cardiovascular disease risk independently of blood pressure variation (odds ratio per SD increase in log NT-proBNP 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.45; P=0.007). Atenolol-based treatment led to a 69.6% increase in NT-proBNP at 6 months (P<0.0001). In contrast, amlodipine-based treatment reduced NT-proBNP by 36.5% (P<0.0001). Amlodipine recipients who achieved a 6-month NT-proBNP below the median (61 pg/mL) were at lower risk of cardiovascular disease when compared with those who did not (odds ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.91) after adjustment for confounders inclusive of baseline NT-proBNP and achieved blood pressure. If confirmed, these novel results suggest that NT-proBNP, as well as aiding cardiovascular disease risk assessment, may also help assess the efficacy of specific antihypertensive regimens. Further relevant studies seem warranted.
AuthorsPaul Welsh, Neil R Poulter, Choon L Chang, Peter S Sever, Naveed Sattar, ASCOT Investigators
JournalHypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) (Hypertension) Vol. 63 Issue 3 Pg. 507-13 (Mar 2014) ISSN: 1524-4563 [Electronic] United States
PMID24324046 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Antihypertensive Agents
  • Biomarkers
  • Peptide Fragments
  • Protein Precursors
  • pro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)
  • Natriuretic Peptide, Brain
Topics
  • Aged
  • Antihypertensive Agents (therapeutic use)
  • Biomarkers (blood)
  • Blood Pressure (drug effects)
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Hypertension (blood, drug therapy, epidemiology)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Natriuretic Peptide, Brain (blood)
  • Odds Ratio
  • Peptide Fragments (blood)
  • Prevalence
  • Prognosis
  • Protein Precursors
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Assessment (methods)
  • Risk Factors
  • Scandinavian and Nordic Countries (epidemiology)
  • Time Factors
  • United Kingdom (epidemiology)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: