HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Ethical considerations regarding early liver transplantation in patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis not responding to medical therapy.

Abstract
A recent study proposed that liver transplantation may represent life-saving treatment in patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis not responding to medical therapy. In this pilot experience, stringent patient selection resulted in major improvement of short-term survival with low rates of post-transplant alcohol relapse. In the context of organ shortage, which imposes a need for strict selection of transplant candidates, these results raise major ethical questions. Reluctance to perform liver transplantation in alcoholics is based on the fact that alcoholism is frequently considered to be self-inflicted and on fears of harmful post-transplant alcoholism recurrence. A minimal interval of sobriety lasting at least 6 months is a widely adopted criterion for the selection of patients with alcoholic liver disease for liver transplantation. In severe alcoholic hepatitis, the disastrous short-term prognosis in patients not responding to medical therapy does not allow one to reasonably impose an arbitrary period of 6-months of abstinence. This means that these patients must be either systematically excluded from transplantation or selected according to other criteria. Without significant pre-transplant abstinence, it might be argued that these patients do not merit a graft as they have not demonstrated their ability to gain control over their disease through durable modification of their behaviour. Consequently, this procedure could have a negative impact in the public, affecting organ donation and confidence in the fairness of transplant programs. In contrast, ethical principles recommend active treatment of patients, without discrimination, according to the best scientific knowledge. At this stage, we propose that there are no major ethical barriers for further evaluation of this new therapeutic option. The next steps should include transparent communication with the public and further studies to reproduce these results and identify the selection criteria that provide the best long-term outcomes.
AuthorsVincent Donckier, Valerio Lucidi, Thierry Gustot, Christophe Moreno
JournalJournal of hepatology (J Hepatol) Vol. 60 Issue 4 Pg. 866-71 (Apr 2014) ISSN: 1600-0641 [Electronic] Netherlands
PMID24291238 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Review)
CopyrightCopyright © 2013 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Topics
  • Hepatitis, Alcoholic (surgery, therapy)
  • Humans
  • Liver Transplantation (ethics)
  • Patient Selection (ethics)
  • Pilot Projects
  • Prognosis
  • Prospective Studies
  • Public Opinion
  • Temperance (ethics)
  • Time Factors
  • Tissue and Organ Procurement (ethics)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: