HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Systematic review of the performance of rapid rifampicin resistance testing for drug-resistant tuberculosis.

AbstractINTRODUCTION:
Rapid tests for rifampicin resistance may be useful for identifying isolates at high risk of drug resistance, including multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB). However, choice of diagnostic test and prevalence of rifampicin resistance may both impact a diagnostic strategy for identifying drug resistant-TB. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the performance of WHO-endorsed rapid tests for rifampicin resistance detection.
METHODS:
We searched MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library through January 1, 2012. For each rapid test, we determined pooled sensitivity and specificity estimates using a hierarchical random effects model. Predictive values of the tests were determined at different prevalence rates of rifampicin resistance and MDR-TB.
RESULTS:
We identified 60 publications involving six different tests (INNO-LiPA Rif. TB assay, Genotype MTBDR assay, Genotype MTBDRplus assay, Colorimetric Redox Indicator (CRI) assay, Nitrate Reductase Assay (NRA) and MODS tests): for all tests, negative predictive values were high when rifampicin resistance prevalence was ≤ 30%. However, positive predictive values were considerably reduced for the INNO-LiPA Rif. TB assay, the MTBDRplus assay and MODS when rifampicin resistance prevalence was < 5%.
LIMITATIONS:
In many studies, it was unclear whether patient selection or index test performance could have introduced bias. In addition, we were unable to evaluate critical concentration thresholds for the colorimetric tests.
DISCUSSION:
Rapid tests for rifampicin resistance alone cannot accurately predict rifampicin resistance or MDR-TB in areas with a low prevalence of rifampicin resistance. However, in areas with a high prevalence of rifampicin resistance and MDR-TB, these tests may be a valuable component of an MDR-TB management strategy.
AuthorsMatthew Arentz, Bess Sorensen, David J Horne, Judd L Walson
JournalPloS one (PLoS One) Vol. 8 Issue 10 Pg. e76533 ( 2013) ISSN: 1932-6203 [Electronic] United States
PMID24098523 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Review, Systematic Review)
Chemical References
  • Antitubercular Agents
  • Reagent Kits, Diagnostic
  • Rifampin
Topics
  • Antitubercular Agents (therapeutic use)
  • Bias
  • Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial
  • Humans
  • Microbial Sensitivity Tests (statistics & numerical data)
  • Mycobacterium tuberculosis (drug effects, pathogenicity, physiology)
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Reagent Kits, Diagnostic
  • Rifampin (therapeutic use)
  • Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant (drug therapy, microbiology)
  • Tuberculosis, Pulmonary (drug therapy, microbiology)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: