HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Protocol for diagnostic test accuracy study: the efficacy of screening for common dental diseases by dental care professionals.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
The bulk of service delivery in dentistry is delivered by general dental practitioners, when a large proportion of patients who attend regularly are asymptomatic and do not require treatment. This represents a substantial and unnecessary cost, given that it is possible to delegate a range of tasks to dental care professionals, who are a less expensive resource. Screening for the common dental diseases by dental care professionals has the potential to release general dental practitioner's time and increase the capacity to care for those who don't currently access services. The aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic test accuracy of dental care professionals when screening for dental caries and periodontal disease in asymptomatic adults aged eighteen years of age.
METHODS/DESIGN:
Ten dental practices across the North-West of England will take part in a diagnostic test accuracy study with 200 consecutive patients in each practice. The dental care professionals will act as the index test and the general dental practitioner will act as the reference test. Consenting asymptomatic patients will enter the study and see either the dental care professionals or general dental practitioner first to remove order effects. Both sets of clinicians will make an assessment of dental caries and periodontal disease and enter their decisions on a record sheet for each participant. The primary outcome measure is the diagnostic test accuracy of the dental care professionals and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values will be reported. A number of clinical factors will be assessed for confounding.
DISCUSSION:
The results of this study will determine whether dental care professionals can screen for the two most prevalent oral diseases. This will inform the literature and is apposite given the recent policy change in the United Kingdom towards direct access.
AuthorsRichard Macey, Tanya Walsh, Anne-Marie Glenny, Helen Worthington, Martin Tickle, James Ashley, Paul Brocklehurst
JournalBMC oral health (BMC Oral Health) Vol. 13 Pg. 45 (Sep 21 2013) ISSN: 1472-6831 [Electronic] England
PMID24053760 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural)
Topics
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Clinical Protocols
  • Dental Auxiliaries (economics, statistics & numerical data)
  • Dental Caries (diagnosis)
  • Dentists (economics)
  • Diagnostic Errors (prevention & control)
  • Diagnostic Tests, Routine (economics, standards)
  • Efficiency, Organizational
  • England
  • General Practice, Dental (economics)
  • Humans
  • Mass Screening (economics, standards)
  • Periodontal Diseases (diagnosis)
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • State Dentistry (economics)
  • Young Adult

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: