Focal
hyperhidrosis often has a substantial psychological and social impact on quality of life, since it interferes with daily activities. To date, for the treatment of focal
hyperhidrosis, the
botulinum toxin type A is an effective second line tool. The purpose of this study was to compare
Onabotulinumtoxin A (
Botox(®)) and Incobotulinumtoxin A (
Xeomin(®)) administration in the treatment of palmar
hyperhidrosis. In a double-blind clinical trial, 25 patients with moderate or severe palmar
hyperhidrosis received in the same session
intradermal injections of
Onabotulinumtoxin A on one hand and Incobotulinumtoxin A on the other. Several measures of efficacy and safety were evaluated: disease severity improvement, sweat reduction, hand-grip strength decrease,
pain/discomfort during the treatment, and patient's global satisfaction. All patients were responsive to the treatments (HDSS at T4 vs HDDs at T0; p < 0.0001), and no significant difference between
Onabotulinumtoxin A and Incobotulinumtoxin A in terms of anhidrotic effect (Minor's test at T4; p = 0.51), long-term efficacy (Minor's test at T12; p = 0.76), (Minor's test at T24; p = 0.58), subjective
pain related to the
injections (p = 0.88), muscle strength reduction
after treatment (p = 0.56), and global satisfaction with the treatment (p = 0.26).
Onabotulinum toxin A and Incobotulinumtoxin A seem to be comparable in terms of anhidrotic effect (short-term results), duration of benefits (long-term efficacy), muscle strength reduction (safety),
pain related to
injections (tolerability), and treatment satisfaction expressed by patients.