Abstract |
Meta-analysis is aimed at assessing an exhaustive, unbiased, reproducible, quantified and accurate synthesis of a research problem. It is sustained by a systematic review of the literature and has statistical particularities. Sources of error and bias are numerous. In this paper, we describe them following the methodology steps of a well-conducted meta-analysis. Causes of divergent conclusions of meta-analyses are described and illustrated with the example of cancer risk assessment in TNF inhibitor-treated rheumatoid arthritis patients. Eventually, this article provides key-points to help readers to detect sources of error and bias in meta-analyses.
|
Authors | G Moulis, A Sommet |
Journal | La Revue de medecine interne
(Rev Med Interne)
Vol. 35
Issue 4
Pg. 250-8
(Apr 2014)
ISSN: 1768-3122 [Electronic] France |
Vernacular Title | Comment lire une méta-analyse? |
PMID | 24029290
(Publication Type: Journal Article, Review, Systematic Review)
|
Copyright | Copyright © 2013 Société nationale française de médecine interne (SNFMI). Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved. |
Chemical References |
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents
- Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
|
Topics |
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents
(therapeutic use)
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
(drug therapy, epidemiology)
- Bias
- Data Interpretation, Statistical
- Evidence-Based Medicine
(methods, statistics & numerical data)
- Humans
- Meta-Analysis as Topic
- Neoplasms
(epidemiology, etiology)
- Research Design
- Risk Factors
- Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
(antagonists & inhibitors)
|