HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Retention of blinding at follow-up in a randomized clinical study using a sham-control cervical manipulation procedure for neck pain: secondary analyses from a randomized clinical study.

AbstractOBJECTIVE:
Participants in clinical trials of spinal manipulation have not been rigorously blinded to group assignment. This study reports on secondary analyses of the retention of participant blinding beyond the immediate posttreatment time frame following a single-session, randomized clinical study. A novel control cervical manipulation procedure that has previously been shown to be therapeutically inert was contrasted with a typical manipulation procedure.
METHODS:
A randomized clinical study of a single session of typical vs sham-control manipulation in patients with chronic neck pain was conducted. Findings of self-reported group registration at 24 to 48 hours posttreatment were computed. The Blinding Index (BI) of Bang et al was then applied to both the immediate and post-24- to 48-hour results.
RESULTS:
Twenty-four to 48 hours after treatment, 94% and 22% of participants in the typical and control groups, respectively, correctly identified their group assignment. When analyzed with the BI of Bang et al, the immediate posttreatment BI for the group receiving a typical manipulation was 0.22 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.03 to 0.47); for the group receiving a control manipulation, it was 0.19 (95% CI, -0.06 to 0.43). The BI at post-24 hours was as follows: typical = 0.75 (95% CI, 0.59-0.91) and control = -0.34 (95% CI, -0.58 to -0.11).
CONCLUSIONS:
This study found that the novel sham-control cervical manipulation procedure may be effective in blinding sham group allocation up to 48 hours posttreatment. It appears that, at 48 hours posttreatment, the modified form of the typical cervical manipulation was not. The sham-control procedure appears to be a promising procedure for future clinical trials.
AuthorsHoward Vernon, John T Triano, David Soave, Maricelle Dinulos, Kim Ross, Steven Tran
JournalJournal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics (J Manipulative Physiol Ther) Vol. 36 Issue 8 Pg. 522-6 (Oct 2013) ISSN: 1532-6586 [Electronic] United States
PMID24011656 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
Copyright© 2013. Published by National University of Health Sciences All rights reserved.
Chemical References
  • Placebos
Topics
  • Adult
  • Biomedical Research
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Manipulation, Spinal (methods)
  • Neck Pain (therapy)
  • Pain Measurement (methods)
  • Placebos
  • Range of Motion, Articular
  • Research Design

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: