HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Does the direct anterior approach in THA offer faster rehabilitation and comparable safety to the posterior approach?

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Newer surgical approaches to THA, such as the direct anterior approach, may influence a patient's time to recovery, but it is important to make sure that these approaches do not compromise reconstructive safety or accuracy.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES:
We compared the direct anterior approach and conventional posterior approach in terms of (1) recovery of hip function after primary THA, (2) general health outcomes, (3) operative time and surgical complications, and (4) accuracy of component placement.
METHODS:
In this prospective, comparative, nonrandomized study of 120 patients (60 direct anterior THA, 60 posterior THAs), we assessed functional recovery using the VAS pain score, timed up and go (TUG) test, motor component of the Functional Independence Measure™ (M-FIM™), UCLA activity score, Harris hip score, and patient-maintained subjective milestone diary and general health outcome using SF-12 scores. Operative time, complications, and component placement were also compared.
RESULTS:
Functional recovery was faster in patients with the direct anterior approach on the basis of TUG and M-FIM™ up to 2 weeks; no differences were found in terms of the other metrics we used, and no differences were observed between groups beyond 6 weeks. General health outcomes, operative time, and complications were similar between groups. No clinically important differences were observed in terms of implant alignment.
CONCLUSIONS:
We observed very modest functional advantages early in recovery after direct anterior THA compared to posterior-approach THA. Randomized trials are needed to validate these findings, and these findings may not generalize well to lower-volume practice settings or to surgeons earlier in the learning curve of direct anterior THA.
AuthorsJosé A Rodriguez, Ajit J Deshmukh, Parthiv A Rathod, Michelle L Greiz, Prashant P Deshmane, Matthew S Hepinstall, Amar S Ranawat
JournalClinical orthopaedics and related research (Clin Orthop Relat Res) Vol. 472 Issue 2 Pg. 455-63 (Feb 2014) ISSN: 1528-1132 [Electronic] United States
PMID23963704 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article)
Topics
  • Activities of Daily Living
  • Aged
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip (adverse effects, methods)
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Chi-Square Distribution
  • Disability Evaluation
  • Female
  • Hip Joint (physiopathology, surgery)
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pain Measurement
  • Postoperative Complications (diagnosis, physiopathology)
  • Prospective Studies
  • Recovery of Function
  • Risk Factors
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: