HOMEPRODUCTSSERVICESCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaMobileSign Up FREE or Login

Family members' perceptions of inpatient palliative care consult services: a qualitative study.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Family members are commonly involved in end-of-life decision making and typically involved in inpatient palliative care consultations. Although much research has documented patient outcomes following inpatient palliative care consultation, little is known about family member perceptions of the consultation.
AIM:
The purpose of this study was to determine how inpatient palliative care consultations impacted family members' understanding of the patient's condition, knowledge of available care options, and decision-making ability.
DESIGN:
An exploratory, qualitative study was conducted employing individual interviews among family members of seriously ill patients, recruited purposively. Interviews were conducted in person, at the hospital, or via telephone, using a semistructured protocol.
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS:
Family members of seriously ill patients were recruited from a nonprofit, community hospital.
RESULTS:
Interviews were conducted among 23 family members. Four themes were identified and included: perceived qualities of the inpatient palliative care consultation, family readiness, impact on decision-making process, and focus on comfort and quality of life. While most comments reflected positive aspects of the inpatient palliative care consult, such as improved pain control and communication, and increased access to medical professionals and time to discuss patient conditions, some themes reflected a lack of adequate preparation for the inpatient palliative care consultation and readiness for discussing prognosis.
CONCLUSION:
Family members report discussion with the inpatient palliative care team results in improved communication and knowledge, which contributes to decision-making ability. However, palliative care consultation may be improved by developing stronger protocols for introducing palliative care and by including the attending physician in the process to preclude conflicting, inconsistent information and recommendations.
AuthorsSusan Enguidanos, Patricia Housen, Marcia Penido, Bill Mejia, Julie Anne Miller
JournalPalliative medicine (Palliat Med) Vol. 28 Issue 1 Pg. 42-8 (Jan 2014) ISSN: 1477-030X [Electronic] England
PMID23744841 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Topics
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Chronic Disease (therapy)
  • Communication
  • Conflict (Psychology)
  • Decision Making
  • Family (psychology)
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Interviews as Topic
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Palliative Care (methods)
  • Patient Care Team (standards)
  • Professional-Family Relations
  • Qualitative Research
  • Referral and Consultation (standards, utilization)
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Terminal Care (psychology)
  • United States
  • Young Adult

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research network!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password: