HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Priorities for treatment, care and information if faced with serious illness: a comparative population-based survey in seven European countries.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Health-care costs are growing, with little population-based data about people's priorities for end-of-life care, to guide service development and aid discussions.
AIM:
We examined variations in people's priorities for treatment, care and information across seven European countries.
DESIGN:
Telephone survey of a random sample of households; we asked respondents their priorities if 'faced with a serious illness, like cancer, with limited time to live' and used multivariable logistic regressions to identify associated factors.
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS:
Members of the general public aged ≥ 16 years residing in England, Flanders, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain.
RESULTS:
In total, 9344 individuals were interviewed. Most people chose 'improve quality of life for the time they had left', ranging from 57% (95% confidence interval: 55%-60%, Italy) to 81% (95% confidence interval: 79%-83%, Spain). Only 2% (95% confidence interval: 1%-3%, England) to 6% (95% confidence interval: 4%-7%, Flanders) said extending life was most important, and 15% (95% confidence interval: 13%-17%, Spain) to 40% (95% confidence interval: 37%-43%, Italy) said quality and extension were equally important. Prioritising quality of life was associated with higher education in all countries (odds ratio = 1.3 (Flanders) to 7.9 (Italy)), experience of caregiving or bereavement (England, Germany, Portugal), prioritising pain/symptom control over having a positive attitude and preferring death in a hospice/palliative care unit. Those prioritising extending life had the highest home death preference of all groups. Health status did not affect priorities.
CONCLUSIONS:
Across all countries, extending life was prioritised by a minority, regardless of health status. Treatment and care needs to be reoriented with patient education and palliative care becoming mainstream for serious conditions such as cancer.
AuthorsIrene J Higginson, Barbara Gomes, Natalia Calanzani, Wei Gao, Claudia Bausewein, Barbara A Daveson, Luc Deliens, Pedro L Ferreira, Franco Toscani, Marjolein Gysels, Lucas Ceulemans, Steffen T Simon, Joachim Cohen, Richard Harding, Project PRISMA
JournalPalliative medicine (Palliat Med) Vol. 28 Issue 2 Pg. 101-10 (Feb 2014) ISSN: 1477-030X [Electronic] England
PMID23703237 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Topics
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Attitude to Death
  • Cross-Cultural Comparison
  • Decision Making
  • Europe (epidemiology)
  • Female
  • Health Priorities
  • Humans
  • Information Dissemination
  • Interviews as Topic
  • Life Expectancy
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasms (mortality, psychology)
  • Odds Ratio
  • Palliative Care
  • Patient Education as Topic
  • Patient Preference
  • Quality of Life
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Terminal Care
  • Terminally Ill (psychology)
  • Young Adult

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: