HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Budesonide/formoterol via Turbuhaler® versus formoterol via Turbuhaler® in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: phase III multinational study results.

AbstractBACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:
The efficacy and tolerability of budesonide/formoterol versus formoterol in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was evaluated.
METHODS:
In this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, phase III study (NCT01069289), patients with moderate to severe COPD for ≥2 years received either budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 μg two inhalations twice daily via Turbuhaler® or formoterol 4.5 μg two inhalations twice daily via Turbuhaler® for 12 weeks. Salbutamol was available as reliever medication. Primary outcome variable: change from baseline to average during treatment in pre-dose forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 ).
RESULTS:
One thousand two hundred ninety-three patients were randomized (budesonide/formoterol n = 636; formoterol n = 657). Both budesonide/formoterol and formoterol increased pre-dose FEV1 versus baseline (improvements of 4.6% and 1.5% over baseline, respectively), with the increase from baseline being significantly greater with budesonide/formoterol versus formoterol (budesonide/formoterol:formoterol ratio 1.032; 95% confidence interval: 1.013-1.052; P = 0.0011). The budesonide/formoterol group had a significantly prolonged time to first exacerbation versus the formoterol group (hazard ratio: 0.679; 95% confidence interval: 0.507-0.909; P = 0.0094) and significantly greater improvements in many secondary outcome measures. Both treatments were well tolerated; the incidence and type of adverse events were similar: most commonly reported (budesonide/formoterol vs formoterol): COPD (8.0% vs 9.4%) and nasopharyngitis (5.5% vs 4.9%).
CONCLUSIONS:
Budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 μg two inhalations twice daily was effective and well tolerated in patients with moderate to severe COPD, offering benefits over formoterol alone in terms of improved lung function and reduced risk of exacerbation.
AuthorsYoshinosuke Fukuchi, Ronnie Samoro, Rustem Fassakhov, Hiroyuki Taniguchi, Jan Ekelund, Lars-Goran Carlsson, Masakazu Ichinose
JournalRespirology (Carlton, Vic.) (Respirology) Vol. 18 Issue 5 Pg. 866-73 (Jul 2013) ISSN: 1440-1843 [Electronic] Australia
PMID23551359 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Phase III, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Copyright© 2013 The Authors. Respirology © 2013 Asian Pacific Society of Respirology.
Chemical References
  • Bronchodilator Agents
  • Ethanolamines
  • Budesonide
  • Formoterol Fumarate
Topics
  • Administration, Inhalation
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Bronchodilator Agents (administration & dosage, adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Budesonide (administration & dosage, adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Ethanolamines (administration & dosage, adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Female
  • Forced Expiratory Volume (physiology)
  • Formoterol Fumarate
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nebulizers and Vaporizers (classification)
  • Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive (drug therapy, physiopathology)
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: