HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Effects of cervical orthoses on neck biomechanical responses during transitioning from supine to upright.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Our objectives were to use a hybrid cadaveric/surrogate model to evaluate the effects of the cervicothoracic orthosis and collar on head and neck biomechanical responses during transitioning from supine to upright.
METHODS:
The model consisted of an adult-male surrogate dummy with its artificial neck replaced by a human neck specimen (n=10). The model was transitioned from supine to upright using a rotation apparatus. A high-speed digital camera tracked motions of the head, vertebrae, cervicothoracic orthosis, pelvis, and rotation apparatus. Head load cell data were used to compute occipital condyle loads. Average peak spinal loads and motions were statistically compared (P<0.05) among experimental conditions (cervicothoracic orthosis: anterior strut locked and unlocked; collar; and unrestricted).
FINDINGS:
Loads at the occipital condyles consisted of anterior shear, compression, and extension moment. The most rigid device tested, cervicothoracic orthosis with anterior strut locked, significantly reduced axial compression neck force and increased anterior shear neck force and provided the greatest immobilization by significantly reducing spinal rotations as compared to other experimental conditions. Similar neck biomechanical responses were observed between the cervicothoracic orthosis, anterior strut unlocked, and collar.
INTERPRETATION:
The simple maneuver of supine-to-upright transitioning, commonly performed clinically, produced complex neck loads and motions including head protrusion which caused cervical spine snaking. Neck motions consisted of extension at the upper cervical spine and flexion at the subaxial cervical spinal levels. Of the devices tested, the cervicothoracic orthosis, with anterior strut locked, provided the greatest cervical spine immobilization thereby reducing the risk of potential secondary neck injuries.
AuthorsPaul C Ivancic
JournalClinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) (Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)) Vol. 28 Issue 3 Pg. 239-45 (Mar 2013) ISSN: 1879-1271 [Electronic] England
PMID23434342 (Publication Type: Journal Article)
CopyrightCopyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Topics
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Braces
  • Cadaver
  • Cervical Vertebrae (injuries, physiopathology)
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Immobilization
  • Male
  • Neck
  • Neck Injuries (physiopathology, rehabilitation)
  • Posture (physiology)
  • Range of Motion, Articular (physiology)
  • Rotation

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: