Abstract | OBJECTIVE: To test the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference in the craniofacial morphology and orofacial airway dimensions between mouth breathing (MB) and nasal breathing (NB) subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lateral cephalometric radiographs of 34 MB subjects (mean age: 12.8±1.5 years; range: 12.0-15.2 years) and 33 NB subjects (mean 13.9±1.3 years; age range: 12.2-15.8 years) with Class I occlusion were examined. Totally, 34 measurements (27 craniofacial and 7 orofacial airway) were evaluated. Group differences were statistically evaluated by independent samples t-test at p<0.05 levels. RESULTS: Statistical comparisons showed that SNA (p<0.01), ANB (p<0.01), A to N perp (p<0.05), convexity (p<0.05), IMPA (p<0.05) and overbite (p<0.05) measurements were significantly lower in MB group when compared to NB group. However, SN-MP (p<0.01) and PP-GoGn (p<0.01) from angular measurements and S-N (p<0.05) and anterior facial height (p<0.05) from linear measurements were significantly higher in MB subjects. Among orofacial airway measurements, only upper posterior airway space was found significantly higher(p<0.001) in MB than NB subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The null hypothesis was rejected. Mouth breathing affects craniofacial morphology and orofacial airway dimensions.
|
Authors | Faruk I Ucar, Tancan Uysal |
Journal | Progress in orthodontics
(Prog Orthod)
Vol. 13
Issue 3
Pg. 210-7
(Nov 2012)
ISSN: 2196-1042 [Electronic] Germany |
PMID | 23260531
(Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
|
Copyright | Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Srl. |
Topics |
- Adolescent
- Airway Obstruction
(pathology)
- Cephalometry
- Child
- Cross-Sectional Studies
- Face
(anatomy & histology, diagnostic imaging)
- Female
- Humans
- Male
- Maxillofacial Development
- Mouth Breathing
(pathology)
- Pharynx
(anatomy & histology)
- Radiography
- Reproducibility of Results
- Respiration
- Respiratory System
(anatomy & histology, pathology)
- Vertical Dimension
|