HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Management and outcomes of patients with epiphora referred to a specialist ophthalmic plastic unit.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
To describe the aetiology and management of the symptom epiphora presenting to a specialist ophthalmic service.
DESIGN:
A retrospective case series and patient postal questionnaire of all new referrals seen in a specialist unit with primary symptoms of epiphora between January 2007 and December 2008. The study was begun in 2010 to allow a 2-year follow-up for this cohort.
PARTICIPANTS:
Two hundred thirty-seven patients were identified, of which 192 met the inclusion criteria. Fifty-seven were male, 135 were female, with a mean age of 60.7 (range 0-95) years.
METHODS:
Patients were identified using a key word search of clinic letters and a search of primary care coding.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:
Duration of symptoms, referral source, aetiology and subjective improvement of symptoms post treatment.
RESULTS:
At consultation, patients had experienced epiphora for a mean of 41.1 (range 0.066-360) months. A diagnosis of partial or complete nasolacrimal duct obstruction (31.8%), dry eye with secondary reflex tearing (29.2%), eyelid malposition (10.4%) and multi-factorial epiphora (28.7%) was made after follow-up and treatment. A postal questionnaire follow-up showed that 25% of patients no longer had any epiphora, with 67% reporting an improvement in their symptoms. Final follow-up was 30-54 months.
CONCLUSIONS:
This study highlights the protean aetiology of the symptom and sign, epiphora. Sparse data exist on the audited success in managing this common symptom and sign. This study helps introduce an example of a benchmark for evaluating the effectiveness of epiphora. The majority of patients were referred, usually by ophthalmologists for lacrimal surgery.
AuthorsDaniel Sibley, Jonathan H Norris, Raman Malhotra
JournalClinical & experimental ophthalmology (Clin Exp Ophthalmol) Vol. 41 Issue 3 Pg. 231-8 (Apr 2013) ISSN: 1442-9071 [Electronic] Australia
PMID22957969 (Publication Type: Journal Article)
Copyright© 2012 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology © 2012 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists.
Topics
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Dry Eye Syndromes (diagnosis, etiology, surgery)
  • Eyelid Diseases (diagnosis, etiology, surgery)
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Lacrimal Apparatus Diseases (diagnosis, etiology, surgery)
  • Male
  • Meibomian Glands (pathology)
  • Middle Aged
  • Ophthalmology
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Referral and Consultation
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Specialization
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Tears (chemistry)
  • Workforce
  • Young Adult

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: