HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

A comparative study of hair removal at an NHS hospital: Luminette intense pulsed light versus electrolysis.

Abstract
Twenty-five women, referred for hair removal by electrolysis, were enrolled in a split face study to treat facial hirsutism. Each patient was treated on six occasions: one-half of the face with electrolysis and the other side with an intense pulsed light source. Patients were evaluated with respect to reduction in hair counts, side effects and discomfort during treatment. Re-growth was assessed at 3, 6 and 9 months following treatment. All patients, except one with very sparse, fair hair growth, preferred treatment with the Intense Pulsed Light and rated their average hair reduction with this method as 77% after five treatments. The overall patient satisfaction rates as determined by visual analogue scales were 8.3 out of 10 for IPL and 5.4 out of 10 for electrolysis.
AuthorsKaren Harris, Janice Ferguson, Samantha Hills
JournalThe Journal of dermatological treatment (J Dermatolog Treat) Vol. 25 Issue 2 Pg. 169-73 (Apr 2014) ISSN: 1471-1753 [Electronic] England
PMID22880984 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article)
Topics
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Electrolysis
  • Face
  • Female
  • Hair Removal (methods)
  • Hirsutism (therapy)
  • Humans
  • Intense Pulsed Light Therapy
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Satisfaction

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: