Abstract | BACKGROUND: METHODS: RESULTS: A total of 85 patients received DI (n=42) or DF (n=43). The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). The ORR and time to progression ( TTP) in the evaluable population (n=65) were 37.5% (DI) vs 33.3% (DF), and 4.2 months vs 4.4 months, respectively. In the intent-to-treat population, the observed ORR, TTP and median overall survival were similar between the two groups. Grade 3-4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and diarrhoea were more frequent in the DI arm as compared with the DF arm (83.3% vs 69.8%, 40.5% vs 18.6%, and 42.9% vs 16.3%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Both docetaxel-based doublet regimens show comparable efficacy; however, the DF regimen was associated with a better toxicity profile and is an alternative treatment option for patients in whom platinum-based regimens are unsuitable.
|
Authors | A Roy, D Cunningham, R Hawkins, H Sörbye, A Adenis, J-R Barcelo, G Lopez-Vivanco, G Adler, J-L Canon, F Lofts, C Castanon, E Fonseca, O Rixe, J Aparicio, J Cassinello, M Nicolson, M Mousseau, A Schalhorn, L D'Hondt, J Kerger, D K Hossfeld, C Garcia Giron, R Rodriguez, P Schoffski, J-L Misset |
Journal | British journal of cancer
(Br J Cancer)
Vol. 107
Issue 3
Pg. 435-41
(Jul 24 2012)
ISSN: 1532-1827 [Electronic] England |
PMID | 22767144
(Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Phase II, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
|
Copyright | © 2012 Cancer Research UK |
Chemical References |
- Taxoids
- Docetaxel
- Irinotecan
- Fluorouracil
- Camptothecin
|
Topics |
- Adult
- Aged
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
(therapeutic use)
- Camptothecin
(administration & dosage, analogs & derivatives)
- Disease Progression
- Docetaxel
- Esophageal Neoplasms
(drug therapy)
- Female
- Fluorouracil
(administration & dosage)
- Humans
- Irinotecan
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Stomach Neoplasms
(drug therapy)
- Taxoids
(administration & dosage)
|