Comparison of Dynesys posterior stabilization and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spinal stenosis L4L5.

Abstract

The aim of this prospective randomized study was to compare the radiological and clinical outcome after treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis L4L5 with or without spondylolisthesis, with either posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) (26 patients) or Dynesys posterior stabilization (27 patients). Demographic characteristics were comparable in both groups. Dynesys stabilization resulted in significantly higher preservation of motion at the index level (p < 0.001), and significantly less (p < 0.05) hypermobility at the adjacent segments. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and VAS for back and leg pain improved significantly (p < 0.05) with both methods, but there was no significant difference between groups. Operation time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay were all significantly (p < 0.001) less in the Dynesys group. The latter benefits may be of particular importance for elderly patients, or those with significant comorbidities. Complications were comparable in both groups. Dynesys posterior stabilization was effective for treating spinal stenosis L4L5 with or without spondylolisthesis.

• Authors: Shang-Won Yu, Shih-Chieh Yang, Ching-Hou Ma, Chin-Hsien Wu, Cheng-Yo Yen, Yuan-Kun Tu
• Journal: Acta orthopaedica Belgica (Acta Orthop Belg) Vol. 78 Issue 2 Pg. 230-9 (Apr 2012) ISSN: 0001-6462 [Print] Belgium
• PMID: 22696995 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)

Topics

• Adult
• Aged
• Blood Loss, Surgical (statistics & numerical data)
• Female
• Humans
• Length of Stay
• Male
• Middle Aged
• Pain Measurement
• Prospective Studies
• Spinal Fusion (methods)
• Spinal Stenosis (complications, surgery)
• Spondylolisthesis (complications, surgery)
• Treatment Outcome