HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Can surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the wrist and hand combined with routine therapy facilitate recovery of arm function in patients with stroke?

AbstractOBJECTIVE:
To investigate whether treatment with surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation to the wrist extensors improves recovery of arm function in severely disabled patients with stroke.
DESIGN:
Single blinded randomized controlled trial.
SETTING:
Acute stroke unit and stroke rehabilitation wards of a university hospital.
PARTICIPANTS:
Patients with no upper limb function (Action Research Arm Test [ARAT] score 0) (N=90; mean age ± SD, 74±11y; 49% men) were recruited to the study within 6 weeks of stroke. Only 67 participants were alive at the end of the study and data from 66 of these people were analyzed.
INTERVENTIONS:
Participants were randomized to surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation using surface electrical stimulators for 30 minutes, twice in a working day for 6 weeks in addition to standardized upper limb therapy or just standardized upper limb therapy.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE:
The primary outcome measure was the ARAT score. Assessments were made at baseline and at 6, 12, 24, and 36 weeks after recruitment.
RESULTS:
There were statistically significant improvements in measures of wrist extensor (mean difference 0.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.0-1.0) and grip strength (mean difference 0.9; 95% CI, 0.1-1.7) over the treatment period. Arm function (ARAT score) was not significantly different between the groups over the treatment period at 6 weeks (mean difference 1.9; 95% CI, -2.9 to 6.8) or over the study period at 36 weeks (mean difference 6.4; 95% CI, -1.8 to 14.7), and the rate of recovery was not significantly different (mean difference 0.7; 95% CI, -0.2 to 1.6).
CONCLUSIONS:
In patients with severe stroke, with no functional arm movement, electrical stimulation of wrist extensors improves muscle strength for wrist extension and grip, and larger studies are required to study its influence on arm function.
AuthorsSheeba Rosewilliam, Shweta Malhotra, Christine Roffe, Peter Jones, Anand D Pandyan
JournalArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (Arch Phys Med Rehabil) Vol. 93 Issue 10 Pg. 1715-21.e1 (Oct 2012) ISSN: 1532-821X [Electronic] United States
PMID22676906 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
CopyrightCopyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Topics
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Arm (physiopathology)
  • Disabled Persons (rehabilitation)
  • Electric Stimulation Therapy
  • Female
  • Hemiplegia (etiology, physiopathology, rehabilitation)
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Regression Analysis
  • Single-Blind Method
  • Stroke (complications)
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: