Is spinal manipulation effective for pain? An overview of systematic reviews.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

This article is aimed at critically evaluating the evidence from systematic reviews (SRs) of spinal manipulation in patients with pain.

DESIGN:

The study was designed as a SR of SRs.

METHODS:

Four electronic databases were searched to identify all relevant articles of the effectiveness of spinal manipulation for pain. SRs were defined as articles employing a repeatable methods section.

RESULTS:

Twenty-two SRs relating to the following pain conditions: low back pain (N = 6), headache (N = 5), neck pain (N = 4), any medical problem (N = 1), carpal tunnel syndrome (N = 1), dysmenorrhea (N = 1), fibromyalgia (N = 1), lateral epicondylitis (N = 1), musculoskeletal conditions (N = 1) and nonspinal pain (N = 1), were included. Positive or, for multiple SR, unanimously positive conclusions were drawn for none of the conditions mentioned earlier.

LIMITATION:

Publication bias as a well-known phenomenon may have been inherited in this article.

CONCLUSION:

Collectively, these data fail to demonstrate that spinal manipulation is an effective intervention for pain management.

• Authors: Paul Posadzki
• Journal: Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) (Pain Med) Vol. 13 Issue 6 Pg. 754-61 (Jun 2012) ISSN: 1526-4637 [Electronic] England
• PMID: 22621391 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Review)
• Copyright: Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Topics

• Humans
• Manipulation, Spinal
• Pain (rehabilitation)
• Treatment Outcome