HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

The differentiation of restrictive cardiomyopathy from constrictive pericarditis.

Abstract
The differentiation of restrictive cardiomyopathy from pericardial constriction remains a difficult clinical problem. Although the historical, noninvasive, and hemodynamic and angiographic features discussed here provide poor discriminating value when considered individually, a combination of clues may suggest one diagnosis or the other. Endomyocardial biopsy affords the greatest hope of avoiding unnecessary surgical exploration. Thoracotomy continues, however, to be the gold standard by which to make the distinction, carrying with it significant risk in patients with underlying restrictive cardiomyopathy.
AuthorsM H Schoenfeld
JournalCardiology clinics (Cardiol Clin) Vol. 8 Issue 4 Pg. 663-71 (Nov 1990) ISSN: 0733-8651 [Print] Netherlands
PMID2249220 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Review)
Topics
  • Biopsy
  • Cardiomyopathy, Restrictive (diagnosis, pathology, surgery)
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Echocardiography
  • Endocardium (pathology)
  • Humans
  • Myocardium (pathology)
  • Pericarditis, Constrictive (diagnosis, pathology, surgery)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: