Abstract | BACKGROUND: Adjunctive abciximab administration has been demonstrated to reduce mortality and reinfarction in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction ( STEMI) referred to invasive management. Standard abciximab regimen consists of an intravenous (IV) bolus followed by a 12-h IV infusion. Experimental studies and small clinical trials suggest the superiority of intracoronary (IC) injection of abciximab over IV route. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to perform a meta-analysis of randomized trials (RCTs) to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of IC vs IV abciximab administration in STEMI patients undergoing primary angioplasty. METHODS: We obtained results from all RCTs enrolling STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The primary endpoint was mortality, while recurrent myocardial infarction, postprocedural epicardial (TIMI 3) and myocardial (MBG 2-3) perfusion were identified as secondary endpoints. The safety endpoint was the risk of major bleeding complications. RESULTS: A total of 8 randomized trials were finally included in the meta-analysis, enrolling a total of 3259 patients. As compared to IV route, IC abciximab was associated with a significant improvement in myocardial perfusion (OR [95% CI]=1.76 [1.28-2.42], p<0.001), without significant benefits in terms of mortality (OR [95% CI]=0.85 [0.59-1.23], p=0.39), reinfarction (OR [95% CI]=0.79 [0.46-1.33], p=0.37), or major bleeding complications (OR [95% CI]=1.19 [0.76-1.87], p=0.44). However, we observed a significant relationship between patient's risk profile and mortality benefits from IC abciximab administration (p=0.011). CONCLUSIONS: The present updated meta-analysis showed that IC administration of abciximab is associated with significant benefits in myocardial perfusion, but not in clinical outcome at short-term follow-up as compared to IV abciximab administration, without any excess of major bleedings in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI. However, a significant relationship was observed between patient's risk profile and mortality benefits from IC abciximab administration. Therefore, waiting for long-term follow-up results and additional randomized trials, IC abciximab administration cannot be routinely recommended, but may be considered in high-risk patients.
|
Authors | Giuseppe De Luca, Monica Verdoia, Harry Suryapranata |
Journal | Atherosclerosis
(Atherosclerosis)
Vol. 222
Issue 2
Pg. 426-33
(Jun 2012)
ISSN: 1879-1484 [Electronic] Ireland |
PMID | 22483166
(Publication Type: Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Review)
|
Copyright | Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. |
Chemical References |
- Antibodies, Monoclonal
- Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments
- Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
- Abciximab
|
Topics |
- Abciximab
- Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary
(adverse effects, mortality)
- Antibodies, Monoclonal
(administration & dosage, adverse effects)
- Coronary Circulation
(drug effects)
- Coronary Vessels
- Evidence-Based Medicine
- Hemorrhage
(chemically induced)
- Humans
- Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments
(administration & dosage, adverse effects)
- Infusions, Intravenous
- Injections, Intra-Arterial
- Injections, Intravenous
- Myocardial Infarction
(mortality, physiopathology, therapy)
- Odds Ratio
- Patient Selection
- Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
(administration & dosage, adverse effects)
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
- Regression Analysis
- Risk Assessment
- Risk Factors
- Secondary Prevention
- Time Factors
- Treatment Outcome
|