HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

An all-purpose nipple ointment versus lanolin in treating painful damaged nipples in breastfeeding women: a randomized controlled trial.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
The negative outcomes associated with painful and damaged nipples have been widely documented in the breastfeeding literature. Numerous studies have been conducted evaluating topical preparations to treat nipple pain and damage with equivocal findings. No studies have evaluated the effectiveness of the increasingly popular all-purpose nipple ointment (APNO). The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the effect of the APNO versus lanolin on nipple pain among breastfeeding women with damaged nipples.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS:
A double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted in a large single-site, tertiary-care hospital in Toronto, ON, Canada. Breastfeeding women (n=151) identified as having damage to one or both nipples were randomized to apply either APNO (intervention group) or lanolin (control group) to their nipples according to the trial protocol. The primary outcome was nipple pain at 1 week after randomization measured using the Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Additional outcomes at 1 week after randomization and 12 weeks postpartum included nipple yeast symptoms and/or mastitis, rates of breastfeeding duration and exclusivity, and maternal satisfaction with infant feeding method and treatment ointment.
RESULTS:
There were no significant group differences in mean pain scores at 1 week after randomization. Women in the lanolin group reported significantly greater satisfaction with their infant feeding method and had nonsignificantly higher breastfeeding duration and exclusivity rates at 12 weeks postpartum.
CONCLUSION:
Results suggest that APNO is not superior to lanolin in treating painful, damaged nipples.
AuthorsCindy-Lee Dennis, Nancy Schottle, Ellen Hodnett, Karen McQueen
JournalBreastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine (Breastfeed Med) Vol. 7 Issue 6 Pg. 473-9 (Dec 2012) ISSN: 1556-8342 [Electronic] United States
PMID22428572 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Anti-Inflammatory Agents
  • Antifungal Agents
  • Dermatologic Agents
  • Drug Combinations
  • Emollients
  • Ointments
  • Miconazole
  • Lanolin
  • Betamethasone
  • Mupirocin
  • Hydrocortisone
Topics
  • Adult
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents (administration & dosage)
  • Anti-Inflammatory Agents (administration & dosage)
  • Antifungal Agents (administration & dosage)
  • Betamethasone (administration & dosage)
  • Breast Diseases (drug therapy, etiology)
  • Breast Feeding (adverse effects)
  • Dermatologic Agents (administration & dosage, pharmacology, therapeutic use)
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Drug Combinations
  • Emollients
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hydrocortisone (administration & dosage)
  • Lanolin (pharmacology, therapeutic use)
  • Miconazole (administration & dosage)
  • Mupirocin (administration & dosage)
  • Nipples (injuries)
  • Ointments
  • Ontario
  • Patient Satisfaction

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: