HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Efficacy of low-frequency low-intensity electrotherapy in the treatment of breast cancer-related lymphoedema: a cross-over randomized trial.

AbstractOBJECTIVE:
To compare the efficacy of low-frequency low-intensity electrotherapy and manual lymphatic drainage in the treatment of chronic upper limb breast cancer-related lymphoedema.
DESIGN:
Cross-over single-blind random clinical trial.
SETTING:
Rehabilitation service.
PARTICIPANTS:
Thirty-six women with chronic upper limb breast cancer-related lymphoedema.
METHODS:
Patients were randomized to undergo 10 sessions of manual lymphatic drainage followed by 10 sessions of low-frequency low-intensity electrotherapy or to undergo first low-frequency low-intensity electrotherapy followed by manual lymphatic drainage. There was a month of washout time between treatments. Each patient was examined just before and after each treatment. Researchers and outcome assessors were blinded for assigned treatment.
MEASURES:
Outcomes were lymphoedema volume, pain, heaviness and tightness, and health-related quality of life measured with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Questionnaire for Breast Cancer version 4 (FACT-B+4). Carry-over, period and treatment effects were analysed. Treatment effect was assessed using paired t-test.
RESULTS:
Thirty patients finalized treatment. Comparing the changes in low-frequency low-intensity electrotherapy with manual lymphatic drainage changes, there were no significant differences. Low-frequency low-intensity electrotherapy did not reduce lymphoedema volume (mean of change = 19.77 mL, P = 0.36), but significant reductions were observed in pain, heaviness and tightness (mean of change = 13.1, 16.2 and 6.4 mm, respectively), and FACT-B+4 summaries improved significantly (Trial Outcome Index mean of change = 5.4, P = 0.015). Manual lymphatic drainage showed no significant changes in any of the outcomes
CONCLUSION:
Although there are no significant differences between treatment changes, the observed trend towards a better health-related quality of life is remarkable in low-frequency low-intensity electrotherapy.
AuthorsRoser Belmonte, Marta Tejero, Montse Ferrer, Josep Maria Muniesa, Esther Duarte, Oriol Cunillera, Ferran Escalada
JournalClinical rehabilitation (Clin Rehabil) Vol. 26 Issue 7 Pg. 607-18 (Jul 2012) ISSN: 1477-0873 [Electronic] England
PMID22172923 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
Topics
  • Aged
  • Breast Neoplasms (complications, surgery)
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Drainage
  • Electric Stimulation Therapy
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lymphedema (etiology, therapy)
  • Postoperative Complications (etiology, therapy)
  • Quality of Life
  • Sickness Impact Profile
  • Single-Blind Method
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: