Abstract | BACKGROUND: METHODS: The systematic literature search in Medline on the use of fish oil/n-3-FA/EPA identified 244 papers, with 38 publications included in the final evaluation. Some smaller trials, often unrandomized and without a control group, reported a good effect of n-3-FA in patients with advanced cancer and cachexia. However, the results of the larger randomized controlled trials could not support the positive results, as they mostly did not find a significant effect. RESULTS: Adverse effects such as abdominal discomfort, fish belching, fish aftertaste, nausea and diarrhoea were reported with a low incidence. No serious adverse effects were documented, but adverse effects often had an impact on quality of life. This often limited dose escalations or even led to discontinuation of n-3-FA. CONCLUSION: There is not enough evidence to support a net benefit of n-3-FA in cachexia in advanced cancer. On the other hand, adverse effects were infrequent, with no severe adverse effects. The results from the review led to a weak negative GRADE recommendation.
|
Authors | Anke Ries, Peter Trottenberg, Frank Elsner, Stephanie Stiel, Dagny Haugen, Stein Kaasa, Lukas Radbruch |
Journal | Palliative medicine
(Palliat Med)
Vol. 26
Issue 4
Pg. 294-304
(Jun 2012)
ISSN: 1477-030X [Electronic] England |
PMID | 21865295
(Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Review, Systematic Review)
|
Chemical References |
- Fatty Acids, Omega-3
- Fish Oils
- Eicosapentaenoic Acid
|
Topics |
- Cachexia
(drug therapy)
- Dietary Supplements
- Eicosapentaenoic Acid
(adverse effects, therapeutic use)
- Fatty Acids, Omega-3
(adverse effects, therapeutic use)
- Fish Oils
(adverse effects, therapeutic use)
- Humans
- Neoplasms
(complications)
- Practice Guidelines as Topic
|