HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Comparison of neosaxitoxin versus bupivacaine via port infiltration for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized, double-blind trial.

AbstractBACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:
Wound infiltration with available local anesthetics generally provides analgesia for less than 8 hrs. The site 1 sodium-channel toxin neosaxitoxin (neoSTX) produced analgesia for over 24 hrs in animals and human volunteers. In this randomized, double-blind trial, we examined the postoperative course of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under a standardized general anesthesia with wound infiltration using either neoSTX or bupivacaine. We hypothesized that neoSTX would reduce pain compared with bupivacaine at 12 hrs postoperatively.
METHODS:
Patients received preincisional infiltration of laparoscope entry sites with 20 mL containing either neoSTX (total dose, 100 μg) or bupivacaine 0.25% (total dose, 50 mg). The primary outcome measure was the visual analog pain score at 12 hrs postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included repeated pain scores at rest and with movement,analgesic use, functional recovery, and adverse effects. Groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests for pain scores, Fisher exact test for proportions of patients with severe pain and complete analgesia, and Kaplan-Meier curves for time to full recovery.
RESULTS:
Among 137 subjects, 69 were randomized to neoSTX and 68 to bupivacaine. Median pain scores at rest and with movement 12 hrs postoperatively were lower in the neoSTX group compared with the bupivacaine group (P<0.01). Additional pain measures and recovery parameters also favored neoSTX. No serious adverse events occurred,and no adverse events were more frequent in the neoSTX group.
CONCLUSIONS:
NeoSTX shows promise as a long-acting local anesthetic. Future studies will examine dose response, combination formulations, and safety with dose escalation.
AuthorsAlberto J Rodríguez-Navarro, Charles B Berde, Gonzalo Wiedmaier, Andres Mercado, Carlos Garcia, Veronica Iglesias, David Zurakowski
JournalRegional anesthesia and pain medicine (Reg Anesth Pain Med) 2011 Mar-Apr Vol. 36 Issue 2 Pg. 103-9 ISSN: 1532-8651 [Electronic] England
PMID21425506 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Phase I, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
CopyrightCopyright © 2011 by American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
Chemical References
  • Saxitoxin
  • neosaxitoxin
  • Bupivacaine
Topics
  • Adult
  • Analgesia (methods)
  • Anesthesia, Local (methods)
  • Bupivacaine (administration & dosage, pharmacokinetics)
  • Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic (adverse effects)
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pain Measurement (drug effects, methods)
  • Pain, Postoperative (etiology, metabolism, prevention & control)
  • Saxitoxin (administration & dosage, analogs & derivatives, pharmacokinetics)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: